Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;17:1134090. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1134090

TABLE 1.

Statistical testing of data in Figure 3 indicates significant differences C9(+/+) parental (Pt. 337) and edited lines following exposure to PolyGR151.

Endpoint Cell line vs. C9(+/+) parental 10 μM 5.618 μM 3.156 μM 1.773 μM 0.996 μM 0.56 μM 0.314 μM 0.177 μM 0.099 μM Vehicle IC50 R2
24 h C9(+/+) parental NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 49.07 0.54
24 h C9(–/+) TD6 A2 NS * ** NS ** NS Ns NS NS NS 20.04 0.75
24 h C9(–/–) TD6 F2 **** **** **** **** **** **** ** NS NS NS 4.225 0.85
24 h C9(–/–) TD6 G11 * **** **** **** **** ** Ns NS NS NS 8.411 0.80
24 h C9(–/+) Expanded Pt. 137 *** **** **** **** **** ** Ns NS NS NS 7.394 0.80
48 h C9(+/+) parental NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 46.53 0.67
48 h C9(–/+) TD6 A2 NS NS * NS * NS NS NS NS NS 5.027 0.72
48 h C9(–/–) TD6 F2 **** **** **** **** **** **** ** NS NS NS 2.675 0.90
48 h C9(–/–) TD6 G11 *** *** **** ** ** NS Ns NS NS NS 12.86 0.85
48 h C9(–/+) Expanded Pt. 137 **** **** **** **** **** **** *** ** NS NS 2.227 0.91

1*Denotes p < 0.05, **denotes p < 0.01, ***denotes p < 0.001, and ****denotes p < 0.0001 comparing changes in neuronal survival at each concentration compared to C9(+/+) parental by two-way ANOVA analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test. IC50s were calculated using a four-parameter logistical regression model.