Table 4.

Association between risk and time preferences and perceived effectiveness of intervention strategies.

	Discount rate ($\delta$)	Present- bias ($\beta$)	Utility curvature ($\sigma$)	Probability weighting ($\alpha$)	Loss aversion ($\lambda$)
Perceived effectiveness	−0.050**	0.002	0.002	0.019**	−0.043*
	(0.02)	(0.00)	(0.00)	(0.01)	(0.02)
Rural	−0.545	−0.081	0.075	1.280***	1.429
	(0.51)	(0.12)	(0.05)	(0.20)	(0.94)
Age	−0.024	−0.000	−0.000	0.006	−0.026
	(0.03)	(0.01)	(0.00)	(0.02)	(0.04)
Gender	0.008	−0.035	−0.064**	−0.185	0.361
	(0.32)	(0.06)	(0.03)	(0.12)	(0.48)
Education	−0.033	−0.045	0.049**	0.431***	0.469
	(0.16)	(0.04)	(0.02)	(0.07)	(0.36)
Income	−0.172	0.030	0.004	0.277***	−0.104
	(0.14)	(0.04)	(0.02)	(0.05)	(0.21)
Family size	0.024	−0.006	0.003	0.037	−0.048
	(0.09)	(0.02)	(0.01)	(0.03)	(0.13)
Travel time	0.004	0.004	−0.001	−0.001	0.003
	(0.01)	(0.00)	(0.00)	(0.00)	(0.01)
Known diabetes duration	0.013	0.000	0.001	0.010	−0.081
	(0.02)	(0.01)	(0.00)	(0.01)	(0.05)
Constant	5.274**	0.728	0.066	−3.096**	4.213
	(2.42)	(0.46)	(0.21)	(1.25)	(3.54)
Number of clusters	166
Number of observations	15,106
Log pseudo-likelihood	−9293.52

Parentheses are standard errors clustered at the individual level. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1.