Table 4.
Variable1 | Univariable models | Multivariable model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude OR (95% CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Child’s age in months | 1.07 (1.02–1.12) | 0.0044 | 1.07 (1.02–1.11) | 0.0056 | |
Child’s sex | Female | 1 | 0.6286 | 1 | 0.2450 |
Male | 0.93 (0.70–1.24) | 0.83 (0.61–1.14) | |||
Positive RDT-result | 0.52 (0.35–0.77) | 0.0013 | 0.57 (0.39–0.82) | 0.0035 | |
Use of mosquito net at night | 2.01 (1.40–2.89) | 0.0003 | 1.76 (1.22–2.53) | 0.0029 | |
Caretaker’s age in years | 1.01 (1.00–1.03) | 0.0184 | 1.00 (0.98–1.01) | 0.8381 | |
Caretaker’s sex | Female | 1 | 0.3450 | 1 | 0.0251 |
Male | 0.77 (0.45–1.33) | 0.50 (0.28–0.91) | |||
Caretaker’s relationship with the child | Parent | 1 | 0.0273 | 1 | 0.6897 |
Other | 1.68 (1.06–2.67) | 1.12 (0.63–2.02) | |||
Is the caretaker able to read and write? | Illiterate | 1 |
0.5293 0.4161 |
1 |
0.8501 0.7876 |
Partially literate | 0.86 (0.54–1.37) | 0.95 (0.56–1.62) | |||
Fully literate | 1.26 (0.72–2.23) | 1.08 (0.61–1.89) | |||
Caretaker’s main type of income | No salary | 1 |
0.2262 0.0869 |
1 |
0.2258 0.0290 |
Self-employment | 0.71 (0.40–1.25) | 0.70 (0.39–1.26) | |||
Paid employment | 2.30 (0.88–6.00) | 2.74 (1.11–6.74) | |||
Caretaker’s marital status | Single (never married) | 1 |
0.1739 0.0617 0.0038 |
1 |
0.5115 0.2918 0.1470 |
Married or in union | 1.43 (0.85–2.41) | 1.21 (0.68–2.16) | |||
Separated or divorced | 2.79 (0.95–8.17) | 1.86 (0.58–5.98) | |||
Widow/er | 4.07 (1.60–10.33) | 2.02 (0.78–5.25) | |||
Caretaker’s religion | Christian | 1 |
0.3841 0.1258 |
1 |
0.0045 0.9579 |
Muslim | 0.82 (0.53–1.29) | 0.51 (0.32–0.81) | |||
Other | 0.18 (0.02–1.64) | 1.11 (0.02–55.32) | |||
District | Bombali | 1 | 1 | ||
Tonkolili | 0.57 (0.23–1.44) | 0.2309 | 0.68 (0.26–1.78) | 0.4271 | |
Port Loko | 0.33 (0.16–0.66) | 0.0023 | 0.40 (0.19–0.87) | 0.0212 | |
Locality | Rural | 1 |
0.3616 0.4678 |
1 | 0.7922 |
Urban | 0.77 (0.37–1.58) | 1.11 (0.50–2.45) |
CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio
1The first listed category of each variable was taken as reference value. In case of dummy variables, “No” was taken as a reference value
*n = 698 observations