Skip to main content
. 2023 May;64(5):797–802. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264529

TABLE 1.

Kinetic Analysis Results

Patient no. Sex VT K 1 K1/k2 BPND vB
EC-07 F 1.17 1.62 0.51 1.31 0.15
EC-10 M 0.63 1.42 0.28 1.23 0.16
EC-13 F 0.99 1.58 0.42 1.34 0.18
EC-20 M 1.20 2.67 0.39 2.12 0.18
EC-23 M 0.83 1.26 0.31 1.66 0.13
CIG-12 M 1.10 2.71 0.57 0.93 0.14
CIG-14 M 4.74 2.29 3.42 0.39 0.14
CIG-17 M 1.14 3.24 0.52 1.21 0.16
CIG-22 F 1.45 2.70 0.66 1.29 0.11
CIG-24 F 1.06 1.62 0.51 1.09 0.15
CON-01 F 1.15 1.95 0.58 0.98 0.18
CON-03 M 1.04 1.85 0.48 1.17 0.15
CON-05 M 0.91 1.37 0.40 1.27 0.15
CON-06 F 1.53 3.19 0.74 1.07 0.17
CON-09 M 1.18 1.62 0.56 1.13 0.13
ECs 0.97 ± 0.24 1.71 ± 0.56 0.38 ± 0.09* 1.53 ± 0.37* 0.16 ± 0.02
CIGs 1.90 ± 1.60 2.51 ± 0.60 1.13 ± 1.28 0.98 ± 0.36 0.14 ± 0.02
CONs 1.16 ± 0.23 1.99 ± 0.70 0.55 ± 0.13 1.12 ± 0.11 0.16 ± 0.02
All 1.34 ± 0.97 2.07 ± 0.67 0.69 ± 0.77 1.21 ± 0.37 0.15 ± 0.02
P 0.36 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.31
*

P < 0.05 on comparison between ECs and NUs.

EC = EC user; CIG = combustible cigarette user; CON = control.

Data are mean values and mean ± SD. P values are from Kruskal–Wallis test comparing 3 groups.