Skip to main content
. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10919

Table 1. Baseline Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population and by the Trajectory Group.

Characteristic No. (%)
Baseline study population (n = 1497)a All participants (n = 1367) Longitudinal sample (n = 1367)
Increaser group (n = 720)b Decreaser group (n = 647)c P valued
Age, median (IQR), y 73 (65-79) 72 (65-79) 70 (62-76) 74 (68-80) <.001
Sex
Male 922 (62) 844 (62) 492 (68) 352 (54) <.001
Female 575 (39) 523 (38) 228 (32) 295 (46)
Stroke type
Ischemic 1312 (88) 1198 (87) 621 (86) 577 (89) .10
Hemorrhagic 185 (12) 169 (12) 99 (14) 70 (11)
OCSP classificatione
TACS 364 (24) 334 (24) 166 (27) 168 (29) .34
PACS 594 (40) 542 (40) 283 (46) 259 (45)
LACS 203 (14) 184 (14) 98 (16) 86 (15)
POCS 126 (8) 114 (8) 60 (10) 54 (9)
Unclear 25 (2) 24 (2) 14 (2) 10 (2)
Living arrangementsf
Living alone 548 (37) 491 (36) 238 (33) 253 (39) .02
Living with someone 949 (63) 846 (64) 482 (67) 394 (61)
Employment status <.001
Full-time 312 (21) 300 (22) 208 (29) 92 (14)
Retired 1079 (72) 968 (71) 453 (63) 515 (80)
Othersg 106 (7) 99 (7) 59 (8) 40 (6)
Educational levelh
≤12 y 769 (51) 695 (51) 395 (55) 300 (46) .002
>12 y 728 (49) 672 (49) 325 (45) 347 (54)
NIHSS score, median (IQR) 3 (2-6) 3 (2-6) 3 (2-6) 3 (2-6) .35
0-3: Very mild stroke 536 (36) 491 (36) 262 (36) 229 (35)
4-5: Mild stroke 525 (35) 472 (35) 256 (36) 216 (33)
≥6: Moderate to severe stroke 436 (29) 404 (29) 202 (28) 202 (31)
Cognitioni
Normal 615 (41) 571 (42) 355 (49) 216 (33) <.001
Impaired 635 (42) 588 (43) 270 (38) 318 (49)
Unclear 247 (17) 208 (15) 95 (13) 113 (18)
Aphasia 267 (18) 239 (18) 119 (17) 120 (19) .33
Able to lift both arms off beds 1171 (78) 1069 (78) 563 (78) 506 (78) .99
Able to walk unaided 787 (53) 723 (53) 405 (56) 318 (49) .009
Total No. of drugs used
0-5 757 (51) 700 (51) 409 (57) 291 (45) <.001
>5 740 (49) 667 (49) 311 (43) 356 (55)
Diabetes comorbidity 299 (20) 272 (20) 128 (18) 144 (22) .04
CAD comorbidity 234 (16) 212 (16) 96 (13) 116 (18) .02
Antihypertensive drugs 1256 (84) 1148 (84) 583 (81) 565 (87) .001
Antihyperlipidemic drugs 1204 (80) 1105 (81) 572 (79) 533 (82) .17
Anticoagulant drugs 439 (29) 385 (28) 174 (24) 211 (33) <.001
Antiplatelet drugs 991 (66) 921 (67) 507 (70) 414 (64) .02
mRS score at 6 mo, median (IQR)j 1 (1-3) 1 (1-3) 1 (0-2) 2 (1-3) <.001
0-2: Good outcome 941 (63) 890 (65) 544 (76) 346 (54)
3-6: Poor outcome 536 (36) 469 (34) 173 (24) 296 (46)
SGPALS rating after stroke, median (IQR)k
1 wk 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) <.001
1 mo 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) 2 (1-2) 1 (1-2) <.001
3 mo 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) 2 (1-2) 1 (1-1) <.001
6 mo 1 (1-2) 1 (1-2) 2 (1-2) 1 (1-1) <.001

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; LACS, lacunar stroke; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OCSP, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; PACS, partial anterior circulation stroke; POCS, posterior circulation stroke; SGPALS, Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale; TACS, total anterior circulation stroke.

a

Sixty-four participants (4.2%) had a recurrent stroke during the first 6 months. Other conditions after the index hospitalization were previously reported elsewhere.12 Of the 1497 participants, 79 (5.2%) stayed in inpatient rehabilitation units.

b

The increaser group had a significant increase in physical activity from 1 week to 6 months after randomization and sustained it at light intensity.

c

The decreaser group had a significant decline in physical activity from 1 week to 6 months after randomization and became inactive.

d

Comparison between the increaser and decreaser groups was conducted using Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Pearson χ2, or Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate.

e

Not applicable in participants with hemorrhagic stroke (n = 185).

f

One participant had an unclear living arrangement.

g

Others included part-time (n = 68), unemployed (n = 15), volunteer (n = 2), or unknown (n = 21).

h

There were 197 participants with missing educational level data.

i

Cognition was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which could not be conducted in 247 participants due to aphasia (n = 26); impairments, including diplopia, hemiparesis, fatigue, or worse general condition (n = 140); unknown reason (n = 60); and administrative or logistics problems (n = 21). Impaired cognition was defined as a score of 1 SD or more below a normative mean after adjusting for age, sex, and educational level.

j

The mRS data were missing in 20 participants, including 5 who withdrew from the study and 15 who were lost to follow-up.

k

The SGPALS data were missing in 167 participants at 1 week, 167 participants at 1 month, 104 participants at 3 months, and 124 participants at 6 months.