Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2023 Mar 23;20(4):559–568. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01799-x

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Performance evaluation of DEL calling on the CHM1+CHM13 benchmark. a. Upset plot depicting DEL callset overlaps of five short-read and three long-read callers (only sets larger than 5 events are displayed for conciseness). Overlaps that include Cue are highlighted in orange. b. Breakdown of DEL calls by consensus with long-read and short-read callers. c. IGV plots of (1) a DEL reported by all short-read callers except Cue and (2) a DEL reported by DELLY, LUMPY, and SvABA that are consistent with a divergent reference repeat.