Reviewer	Employment	Research Grant	Other Research Support	Speakers’ Bureau/Honoraria	Expert Witness	Ownership Interest	Consultant/Advisory Board	Other
Jo-Ann Eastwood	University of California Los Angeles	AHA†	None	Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses: Expert exchange*	None	None	None	None
Michael D. Hill	University of Calgary	Covidien† (money goes to institution); Hoffmann-La Roche Canada† (money goes to institution)	Heart & Stroke Foundation Alberta† (money goes to institution); Alberta Innovates Health Solutions† (money goes to institution)	None	None	None	Merck Ltd.*	None
Marian Limacher	University of Florida	NIH†	None	None	None	None	None	None
Virginia Miller	Mayo Clinic	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Latha Stead	University of Florida	None	None	None	None	None	None	None
Greg Zipfel	Washington University	NINDS†; AHA†; Brain Aneurysm Foundation*; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders*; Pfizer†	None	None	None	None	Pfizer*	None

This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (1) the person receives $10000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (2) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.

^*

Modest.

^†

Significant.