Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants emerged in 2022 with >30 novel amino acid mutations in the spike protein alone. While most studies focus on receptor binding domain changes, mutations in the C-terminus of S1 (CTS1), adjacent to the furin cleavage site, have largely been ignored. In this study, we examined three Omicron mutations in CTS1: H655Y, N679K, and P681H. Generating a SARS-CoV-2 triple mutant (YKH), we found that the mutant increased spike processing, consistent with prior reports for H655Y and P681H individually. Next, we generated a single N679K mutant, finding reduced viral replication in vitro and less disease in vivo. Mechanistically, the N679K mutant had reduced spike protein in purified virions compared to wild-type; spike protein decreases were further exacerbated in infected cell lysates. Importantly, exogenous spike expression also revealed that N679K reduced overall spike protein yield independent of infection. Although a loss-of-function mutation, transmission competition demonstrated that N679K had a replication advantage in the upper airway over wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in hamsters, potentially impacting transmissibility. Together, the data show that N679K reduces overall spike protein levels during Omicron infection, which has important implications for infection, immunity, and transmission.
Introduction
Since its introduction, SARS-CoV-2 has continuously evolved giving rise to multiple Variants of Concern (VOCs) with diverse mutations in the spike protein 1 (Extended Fig. 1A). Present as a trimer on virions, spike is composed of S1 and S2 subunits, responsible for receptor binding and membrane fusion, respectively 2,3. The S1 subunit contains the N-terminal domain (NTD), receptor binding domain (RBD), and the C-terminus of the S1 subunit (CTS1), which harbors a furin cleavage site (FCS) in SARS-CoV-2. Following receptor binding, the spike is cleaved at the S1/S2 site by host proteases to expose the fusion machinery for entry. With the diverse mutations in the spike protein (Extended Fig. 1B), most Omicron studies have focused on the RBD and the impact on vaccine- or infection-induced immunity. However, mutations surrounding the FCS and S1/S2 cleavage site have been demonstrated to drive SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis 4–9 and have been largely unstudied in the context of Omicron.
With this in mind, we set out to evaluate the role of Omicron CTS1 mutations on infection and pathogenesis. Omicron maintains three mutations adjacent to the FCS and S1/S2 cleavage site: H655Y, N679K, and P681H (Extended Fig. 1B). Both H655Y and P681H have previously been observed in the Gamma and Alpha variants 10,11; in contrast, N679K is unique to and maintained by all Omicron subvariants 12. To evaluate the role of these mutations, we used reverse genetics to generate SARS-CoV-2 mutants with all three CTS1 mutations (YKH) or N679K alone in the original WA1 backbone from early 2020. While YKH modestly increases viral replication and spike processing in vitro, N679K results in a loss-of-function mutation that attenuates viral replication in vitro and disease in vivo while skewing replication toward the upper airways through reduced spike protein expression. Given the importance of spike protein for immunity, our finding may have major implications for vaccine efficacy and breakthrough infections.
Results
H655Y, N679K, and P681H together increase viral replication and spike processing.
While the majority of the > 30 spike mutations Omicron acquired are localized to the RBD, three are harbored in the CTS1 adjacent to the furin cleavage site – H655Y, N679K, and P681H (Fig. 1A). Both H655Y and P681H have been observed individually in Gamma and Alpha variants and are associated with increased spike processing. In contrast, N679K is a mutation unique to Omicron and is maintained in all subsequent Omicron subvariants despite involving a single nucleotide change (T/C to A/G) in the wobble codon position 12. Importantly, N679K is adjacent to an important O-linked glycosylation site at T678 13,14; our group has previously shown this glycosylation is important for SARS-CoV-2 infection and protease usage 8.
Several motifs within the CTS1 spike domain, including the furin cleavage site and the upstream QTQTN motif, are key to spike cleavage and host protease interactions, which drive SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. All three Omicron mutations in the CTS1, H655Y, N679K, and P681H, are adjacent to or within these motifs and may impact their function (Fig. 1A and 1B). To evaluate this, we generated a mutant SARS-CoV-2 harboring H655Y, N679K, and P681H in the original WA1 backbone (YKH) (Fig. 1C) 15,16. Plaques produced by the YKH mutant were smaller compared to the parental WA1 (WT) (Fig. 1D). However, the YKH mutant did not attenuate stock titers nor replication kinetics in Vero E6 cells as compared to wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1E and 1F). Notably, while replication was slightly reduced at 24 hpi, end point titers for YKH were augmented at 48 hpi in Calu-3 2B4 cells compared to WT (Fig. 1G). The results suggest that the combination of the three mutations alters infection dynamics, which may offer some advantages to the Omicron variant in human respiratory cells (Fig. 1G). As H655Y and P681H have individually been shown to increase spike processing, we next evaluated spike processing on purified virions from YKH and WT infection. Similar to Delta and Omicron, YKH spike was more processed than WT (Fig. 1H and 1I). At 24 hpi, the S1/S2 cleavage ratio to full length spike ratio was ~2.4:1 for the YKH spike (55% S1/S2 product, 23% full-length); in contrast, WT had roughly equivalent amounts of S1/S2 product and full length. Overall, the combination of H655Y, N679K, and P681H in the YKH mutant resulted in increased viral endpoint yields in human respiratory cells and contributed to Omicron’s enhanced spike processing.
N679K mutation attenuates SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The increase in spike processing found in the YKH mutant is consistent with prior work examining H655Y and P681H mutations individually; however, the contribution of N679K had yet to be evaluated. Based on its location adjacent to a key O-linked glycosylation site 8, we hypothesized that N679K might impact SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 2A). To evaluate potential changes, we generated a SARS-CoV-2 mutant with only N679K in the WA1 backbone (N679K) (Fig. 2B). Our initial characterization found that the N679K plaque sizes were distinctly smaller at days 2 and 3 post-infection (Fig. 2C), and stock titers were also slightly lower than WT (Fig. 2D). These differences in plaque size and stock titers are consistent with observations of most Omicron strains 17–20. Notably, unlike the minimal differences seen in YKH replication kinetics, the N679K mutant had attenuated replication in both Vero E6 and Calu-3 2B4 cells at 24 hpi (Fig. 2E and 2F). Although N679K viral titer recovered by 48 hpi, the results suggest that N679K is a loss-of-function mutation in terms of replication in both cell lines.
We next evaluated N679K in vivo by infecting 3-to-4-week-old golden Syrian hamsters and monitored weight loss and disease over 7 days (Fig. 2G). Hamsters infected with N679K displayed significantly attenuated body weight loss compared to those infected with WT (Fig. 2H). Despite the stark attenuation seen in weight loss, N679K viral titers in the lungs were equivalent to WT at 2 dpi and 4 dpi (Fig. 2I). Similarly, N679K viral titers were comparable to WT at 2 dpi in nasal washes; however, the mutant virus resulted in reduced replication at 4 dpi (Fig. 2J). In addition, analysis of lung histopathology showed a modest, but not significant reduction in disease of the N679K infected hamsters as compared to control (Extended Fig. 2). Taken together, our results indicate that N679K has a distinct loss-of-function phenotype in vitro and in vivo.
N679K mutation results in decreased spike protein expression.
We next sought to determine the mechanism driving the loss-of-function observed with the N679K mutant. Given its location adjacent to the FCS, we first evaluated N679K effects on proteolytic spike processing. Virions were purified from WT, N679K or the Omicron variant BA.1 (Omicron) and blotted for spike processing. Nearly identical to YKH, the N679K mutant had increased spike processing with a ~2.5:1 ratio of S1/S2 cleavage product to full-length spike compared to 1:1 ratio for WT at 24 hpi (Fig. 3A and 3B). However, we noted distinct differences in total spike protein with N679K and Omicron compared to WT, despite similar levels of nucleocapsid protein. Densitometry analysis revealed that the total spike to nucleocapsid (S/N) ratio of N679K and Omicron virions was reduced 21% and 36%, respectively, as compared to WT (Fig. 3C). Overall, our results indicate that the N679K mutant and Omicron variant incorporate less spike protein into their virions.
We then sought to determine if changes in the virion spike were due to changes to total protein expression in the cell or spike incorporation into the particle. To examine spike protein expression, we measured total spike relative to nucleocapsid from infected Vero E6 cell lysates 24 hpi (Fig. 3D and 3E). N679K resulted in a S/N ratio 66% less than WT, displaying an even further decrease in spike protein compared to the reduction in purified virions. Additionally, a similar decrease in S/N ratio was observed in Omicron, indicating that the phenotype is maintained in the context of all the Omicron mutations (Fig. 3D and 3E). Importantly, the RNA transcript ratio for both spike and N following infection of WT and N679K were nearly identical indicating no deficits in RNA expression of spike in the mutant (Fig. 3F). Together, the results indicate that the N679K mutation reduces the Omicron spike protein levels compared to WT following infection.
Having established reduced spike protein in the context of N679K, we next wanted to determine if this reduction only occurs in the context of virus infection or is inherent to the protein. Therefore, we introduced the mutation into the Spike HexaPro plasmid to exogenously express spike protein and separate N679K driven changes from other aspects of viral infection 21. Vero E6 cells were transfected with the WT or N679K mutant spike HexaPro and harvested at 24 and 48 hours post transfection (hpt). Similar to what was observed in viral infection, N679K spike was reduced 43% at 24 hpt and 46% at 48 hpt (Fig. 3G and 3H). Overall, the results across virions, cell lysates, and overexpression systems demonstrate that the reduction in spike protein is governed by the N679K mutation in a manner independent of viral infection (Fig. 3I).
N679K mutation results in preference for the upper airways.
Recognizing that decreased spike expression impacts virus infection, we next evaluated the role of N679K on SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility. Using transmission competition, donor hamsters were infected with a 1:1 ratio of WT:N679K SARS-CoV-2 at a total of 105 pfu (Fig. 4A). At 24 hpi, donors were paired with naive recipients, cohoused for 8 hrs, separated, and donors nasal washed. Nasal wash, trachea, and lung were collected to measure viral RNA populations at 2 and 4 days post infection (dpi) for donors and post contact (dpc) for recipients. Surprisingly, while both viruses transmitted, WT and N679K demonstrated distinct replication sites along the respiratory tract (Fig. 4B). N679K dominated the nasal washes and upper airways while WT primarily seeded the lungs and lower airways. The trachea serves as a midpoint, with no clear delineation between the viruses (Fig. 4B). Having observed this gradation, we returned to the prior hamster study and examined antigen staining of the lung (Fig. 4C). While no significant differences in total antigen were noted, the localization of viral antigen in the N679K infection was distinct and concentrated in the large airways. In contrast, WT was more uniformly distributed in the parenchyma and airways (Fig. 4D). Overall, the results indicate that the N679K mutation shifts viral replication towards airway replication.
Discussion
Most Omicron studies have focused on determining the impact that the RBD mutations have on immune escape, largely overlooking mutations in other spike domains like the CTS1. Harboring the FCS and S1/S2 cleavage site, the CTS1 has been demonstrated as a hotspot for both attenuating and augmenting mutations 4–9. Focusing on Omicron’s three CTS1 mutations – H655Y, N679K, and P681H, we generated infectious clones with all three (YKH) or N679K alone in the SARS-CoV-2 WA1 background. The combination of YKH produced a modest increase in endpoint titers after infection of human respiratory cells, and augmented spike processing, consistent with prior studies that tested the effects of H655Y and P681H individually 10,11. However, the N679K mutant reduced viral replication in vitro and weight loss in vivo. Mechanistic studies determined that both N679K and Omicron have reduced spike protein incorporated into their virions, less spike protein in infected cell lysates, and inferior production using exogenous spike protein expression systems. Our results argue that reduced spike protein in the context the N679K mutation attenuates Omicron strains and may have implications for SARS-CoV-2 immunity by reducing spike antigen thus shifting immune recognition. Additionally, while the N679K mutation attenuated the virus in vivo, our studies indicate a shift toward the upper airways replication. Overall, the data argue that N679K acts as a loss-of-function mutation that has a significant impact on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, pathogenesis, and transmission dynamics.
N679K is likely attenuated because of its decrease in spike protein production. Starting with ~20-30% less spike in its virions, one possibility was a change in spike incorporation. However, an even greater decrease (66%) in spike protein was present in infected Vero E6 cell lysates, indicated that overall spike protein levels were affected. In addition, we found no change in the ratio of spike message relative to N transcript, suggesting the N679K mutation impacts the protein itself. To confirm that the reduction in spike was not a product of virus infection or host immune interactions, we exogenously expressed the spike protein to demonstrate that the N679K spike protein itself was less stable than the WT control. One possible mechanism is that the asparagine-to-lysine change introduces a ubiquitination site that could lead to spike degradation. Another possible mechanism is that the N679K mutation itself may destabilize the protein structurally. Additionally, the N679K substitution adds another basic amino acid to the stretch including the furin cleavage site; the positively charged lysine extends the polybasic cleavage motif and may facilitate cleavage by additional host proteases 22. Overall, while the exact mechanism is unclear, the N679K mutation results in a less stable spike protein that impacts infection and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.
Surprisingly, N679K is uniformly found in 100% of Omicron sequences in GSAID, despite being a single nucleotide change in the wobble position 12. Though attenuated in vitro, N679K does replicate to similar titers as WT in hamster lungs and at day 2 in nasal washes. Notably, N679K outcompetes WT in the upper airways when in direct transmission competition. These results suggest no deficits in transmission and may augment spread as virus replication in the upper airway is more likely to seed new infections. These results also potentially explain why N679K is maintained despite clear attenuation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, addition of H655Y and P681H in the YKH mutant rescues replication in Calu-3 cells, suggesting that other Omicron mutations may compensate for N679K. However, it is unclear if reverting N679K in the Omicron strains would result in a gain in terms of in vitro replication or in vivo pathogenesis. While N679K in SARS-CoV-2 WA1 produces a clear loss-of-function, the constellation of spike mutations and epistatic interactions may mitigate the deficit in Omicron strains. Importantly, the complete conservation of N679K in Omicron also implies some fitness advantage 23–28. From our data, the shift toward upper airway replication by N679K may explain how it is maintained despite lower overall spike protein expression.
In addition to impacting primary infection, the reduction in spike protein may have important implications for SARS-CoV-2 and human immunity. Compared to WT, the N679K mutant produces less spike protein upon infection and can potentially skew the ratio of antibodies targeting spike and nucleocapsid. Prior work with SARS-CoV had shown that an altered spike/nucleocapsid antibody ratio contributed to vaccine failure in aged mice 29. Therefore, infection with Omicron could increase N targeting antibodies at the expense of spike antibodies. The result would be less protective neutralizing antibody, which may facilitate more breakthrough infections. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on the Omicron spike may produce less spike protein due to N679K mutation. In the context of the mRNA bivalent vaccines, the N679K mutation may alter the 1:1 ratio of WT to Omicron spike protein; N679K may bias immune responses towards WT spike protein instead of equally between both spike proteins. In addition, the total amount of spike protein produced may be less than previous vaccines formulations, thus diminishing the overall antibody response. These factors potentially contribute to the less than expected increase in immunity against Omicron strains despite the new bivalent vaccine formulations. Moving forward, reverting K679 back to N679 in vaccine may improve spike protein yields and subsequently improve vaccine response to the Omicron variants.
Together, our results demonstrate that Omicron N679K is a loss-of-function mutation consistently maintained in subvariants. Mechanistically, the N679K mutation attenuates the virus in vitro and in vivo by increasing spike degradation. While the N679K mutation is attenuating in isolation, other Omicron mutations like H655Y and P681H may compensate for the N679K loss of function by amplifying spike processing and infection. However, the decreased spike protein expression by N679K may have implications for immunity induced by infection and vaccines. In addition, while N679K attenuated viral pathogenesis, the shift to the upper airway replication may have enhanced transmissibility and contribute to Omicron emergence. Overall, the data highlight that the Omicron CTS1 mutations have a significant impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection and are worthy of continued study and surveillance.
Methods
Cell Culture
Vero E6 cells were grown in high glucose DMEM (Gibco #11965092) with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic. TMPRSS2-expressing Vero E6 cells were grown in low glucose DMEM (Gibco #11885084) with sodium pyruvate, 10% FBS, and 1 mg/mL Geneticin™ (Invitrogen #10131027). Calu-3 2B4 cells were grown in high glucose DMEM (Gibco #11965092) with 10% defined fetal bovine serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic.
Viruses
The SARS-CoV-2 infectious clones were based on the USA-WA1/2020 sequence provided by the World Reference Center of Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses and the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 30. Mutant viruses (YKH and N679K) were generated with restriction enzyme-based cloning using gBlocks encoding the mutations (Integrated DNA Technologies) and our reverse genetics system as previously described 15,16. Virus stock was generated in TMPRSS2-exrpressing Vero E6 cells to prevent mutations from occurring at the FCS. Viral RNA was extracted from virus stock and cDNA was generated to verify mutations by Sanger sequencing.
Delta isolate (B.1.617.2) was obtained from the World Reference Center of Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses. Infectious clone of Omicron (BA.1) was obtained from Dr. Pei Yong Shi and Dr. Xuping Xie.
In vitro Infection
Vira infections in Vero E6 and Calu-3 2B4 were carried out as previously described 8. Briefly, growth media was removed, and cells were infected with WT or mutant SARS-CoV-2 at an MOI of 0.01 for 45 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. After absorption, cells were washed three times with PBS and fresh complete growth media was added. Three or more biological replicates were collected at each time point and each experiment was performed at least twice. Samples were titrated with plaque assay or focus forming assays.
Plaque Assay
Vero E6 cells were seeded in 6-well plates and grown to 80-100% confluency in complete growth media. Ten-fold serial dilutions in PBS were performed on virus samples. Growth media was removed from cells and 200 μl of inoculum was added to monolayers. Cells were incubated for 45 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. After absorption, 0.8% agarose overlay was added, and cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 days. Plaques were visualized with neutral red stain. Average plaque size was determined using ImageJ.
Focus Forming Assay
Focus forming assays (FFAs) were performed as previously described 31. Briefly, Vero E6 cells were seeded in 96-well plates to be 100% confluent. Samples were 10-fold serially diluted in serum-free media and 20 μl was to infect cells. Cells were incubated for 45 min at 37°C with 5% CO2 before 100 μl of 0.85% methylcellulose overlay was added. Cells were incubated for 24 h 45 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, overlay was removed, and cells were washed three times with PBS before fixed and virus inactivated by 10% formalin for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then permeabilized and blocked with 0.1% saponin/0.1% BSA in PBS before incubated with α-SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) at 1:1000 in permeabilization/blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. Cells are then washed three times with PBS before incubated with Alexa Fluor™ 555-conjugated α-mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen #A28180) at 1:2000 in permeabilization/blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with PBS. Fluorescent foci images were captured using a Cytation 7 cell imaging multi-mode reader (BioTek), and foci were counted manually.
Hamster Infection
Three- to four-week-old male golden Syrian hamsters (HsdHan:AURA strain) were purchased from Envigo. All studies were conducted under a protocol approved by the UTMB Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and complied with USDA guidelines in a laboratory accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Procedures involving infectious SARS-CoV-2 were performed in the Galveston National Laboratory ABSL3 facility. Hamsters were intranasally infected with 105 pfu of WT or N679K SARS-CoV-2 in 100 μl. Infected hamsters were weighed and monitored for illness over 7 days. Hamsters were anesthetized with isoflurane and nasal washes were collected with 400 μl of PBS on endpoint days (2, 4, and 7 dpi). Hamsters were euthanized by CO2 for organ collection. Nasal wash and lung were collected to measure viral titer and RNA. Left lungs were collected for histopathology.
Transmission Competition
Three- to four-week-old male golden Syrian hamsters (HsdHan:AURA strain) were purchased from Envigo. Ten donor hamsters were intranasally infected with a 1:1 ratio of WT:N679K SARS-CoV-2 totaling 105 pfu in 100 μl and were subsequently singly housed. After 24 hrs post infection, individual donor hamsters were cohoused with a recipient hamster for 8 hrs for contact transmission. Following 8 hrs, hamster pairs were separated and housed singly, and nasal washes were collected from donors. At 2 and 4 days post infection for donors and post contact for recipients, hamsters were nasal washed with 400 μl of PBS and euthanized for trachea and lung collection. Nasal washes, tracheas, and lungs were processed in TRIzol and RNA was extracted to perform next generation sequencing.
Virion Purification
Vero E6 cells were grown in T175 flasks to be 100% confluent at time of infection. Cells were infected with 50 μl of virus stock in PBS for 45 min at 37°C with 5% CO2, and growth media with 5% FBS was added after absorption. Supernatant was harvested at 24 hpi and clarified by low-speed centrifugation. Virions were purified from supernatant by ultracentrifugation through a 20% sucrose cushion at 26,000 rpm for 3 hrs using a Beckman SW28 rotor. Pellets were resuspended with 2x Laemmli buffer to obtain protein samples for Western blot.
Western Blot
Protein levels were determined by SDS–PAGE followed by western blot analysis as previously described 8. In brief, sucrose-purified SARS-CoV-2 virions were inactivated by resuspending in 2x Laemmli buffer and boiling. SDS-PAGE gels were run with equal volumes of samples on Mini-PROTEAN TGX gels (Bio-Rad #4561094) followed by transfer onto PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with α-SARS-CoV S primary antibody (Novus Biologicals #NB100-56578) at 1:1000 dilution in 5% BSA in TBST to measure spike protein processing and expression. For loading control, α-SARS Nucleocapsid primary antibody (Novus Biologicals #NB100-56576) at 1:1000 in 5% BSA in TBST was used for viral loading control and α-GAPDH primary antibody (Invitrogen #AM4300) at 1:1000 in 5% BSA in TBST for cellular loading control. Primary antibody incubation was followed by HRP-conjugated α-rabbit secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology #7074) or HRP-conjugated α-mouse secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology #7076) at 1:3000 in 5% milk in TBST. Chemiluminescence signal was developed using Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad #1705060) or Clarity Max Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad #1705062) and imaged with a ChemiDoc MP System (Bio-Rad). Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageLab 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad).
RT-qPCR
Vero E6 cells were infected with an MOI of 1 as detailed above in in vitro infection. Cell lysate was collected at 8 hpi in TRIzol. RNA was extracted from TRIzol samples using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus kit (Zymo #R2072) to be used in two-step RT-qPCR. cDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 μg of total RNA using LunaScript RT Supermix kit (NEB #E3010) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using Luna Universal qPCR Master mix (NEB #M3003) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR cycle was performed as follows: 95°C for 60 s (1 cycle), 95°C for 15 s and 51°C for 30 s then plate read (40 cycles), and melt curve from 65°C to 95°C for 5 s. For spike and nucleocapsid transcripts, a forward primer binding upstream of the transcription regulatory sequence (TRS) leader region (ACCAACCAACTTTCGATCTCT) was used with reverse primers for spike (TGCAGGGGGTAATTGAGTTCT) and nucleocapsid (CCCACTGCGTTCTCCATTCT). The 18S ribosomal RNA primers were forward (CCGGTACAGTGAAACTGCGAATG) and reverse ((GTTATCCAAGTAGGAGAGGAGCGAG). RNA transcript levels for spike and nucleocapsid were determined by ΔΔCt method with 18S as the internal control. Ratios of ΔΔCt spike over ΔΔCt nucleocapsid was reported for each sample.
Spike HexaPro Cloning and Transfection
SARS-CoV-2 S HexaPro was a gift from Jason McLellan (Addgene plasmid #154754) 21. The N679K mutation was cloned into spike HexaPro using a gBlock encoding the mutation (Integrated DNA Technologies) and restriction enzyme-based cloning. Sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing.
Vero E6 cells were grown in 24-well plates to be 100% confluent at time of transfection. Cells were transfected with spike HexaPro WT or N679K plasmid and Lipofectamine 2000 following manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Briefly, 100 ng of spike HexaPro plasmid and 1.5 μl of Lipofectamine 2000 were separately diluted in 50 μl Opti-MEM (Gibco #31985070) before mixing together. After 20 min of room temperature incubation, 100 μl of the transfection mixture was added to cells, and cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cell lysate was harvested with 2x Laemmli buffer at 24 and 48 hours post transfection to be analyzed by Western blot.
Structural Modeling
Structural models previously generated were used as a base to visualize residues mutated in Omicron 8. Briefly, structural models were generated using SWISS-Model to generate homology models for WT and glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on the basis of the SARS-CoV-1 trimer structure (Protein Data Bank code 6ACD). Homology models were visualized and manipulated in PyMOL (version 2.5.4) to visualize Omicron mutations.
Next Generation Sequencing
Next generation sequencing to determine viral RNA populations was performed as previously described 31. Briefly, RNA samples were extracted and prepared for Tiled-ClickSeq libraries 32. A modified pre-RT annealing protocol was applied as previously described31. The final libraries comprising of 300–700 bps fragments were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq platform with paired-end sequencing. The raw Illumina data of the Tiled-ClickSeq libraries were processed with previously established bioinformatics pipelines32. One modification is the introduction of ten wild cards (“N”) covering the N679K mutation in the reference genome to allow bowtie233 to align reads to wild type or variant genomes without bias. PCR duplications were removed using UMI-tools34, and the number of unique reads representing WT and N679K variants were counted thereafter.
Histology
Left lung lobes were harvested from hamsters and fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution for at least 7 days. Fixed tissue was then embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 μM sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) on a SAKURA VIP6 processor by the University of Texas Medical Branch Surgical Pathology Laboratory.
Immunohistochemistry
Fixed and paraffin-embedded left lung lobes from hamsters were cut into 5 μM sections and mounted onto slides by the University of Texas Medical Branch Surgical Pathology Laboratory. Paraffin-embedded sections were warmed at 56°C for 10 min, deparaffinized with xylene (3x 5-min washes) and graded ethanol (3x 100% 5-min washes, 1x 95% 5-min wash), and rehydrated in distilled water. After rehydration, antigen retrieval was performed by steaming slides in antigen retrieval solution (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 6) for 40 min (boil antigen retrieval solution in microwave, add slides to boiling solution, and incubate in steamer). After cooling and rinsing in distilled water, endogenous peroxidases were quenched by incubating slides in TBS with 0.3% H2O2 for 15 min followed by 2x 5-min washes in 0.05% TBST. Sections were blocked with 10% normal goat serum in BSA diluent (1% BSA in 0.05% TBST) for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were incubated with primary anti-N antibody (Sino #40143-R001) at 1:1000 in BSA diluent overnight at 4°C. Following overnight primary antibody incubation, sections were washed 3x for 5 min in TBST. Sections were incubated in secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling Technology #7074) at 1:200 in BSA diluent for 1 hour at room temperature. Following secondary antibody incubation, sections were washed 3x for 5 min in TBST. To visualize antigen, sections were incubated in ImmPACT NovaRED (Vector Laboratories #SK-4805) for 3 min at room temperature before rinsed with TBST to stop the reaction followed by 1x 5-min wash in distilled water. Sections were incubated in hematoxylin for 5 min at room temperature to counterstain before rinsing in water to stop the reaction. Sections were dehydrated by incubating in the previous xylene and graded ethanol baths in reverse order before mounted with coverslips.
Extended Data
Acknowledgments
Research was supported by grants from NIAID of the NIH to (R01-AI153602 and R21-AI145400 to VDM; R24-AI120942 (WRCEVA) to SCW). ALR was supported by a UTMB Institute for Human Infection and Immunity grant and the Sealy and Smith Foundation. Research was also supported by STARs Award provided by the University of Texas System to VDM and Data Acquisition award provided by the Institute for Human Infections and Immunity at UTMB to MNV. Trainee funding provided by NIAID of the NIH to MNV (T32-AI060549).
Mass spectrometry experiments and analysis was provided by the Mass Spectrometry Facility at the University of Texas Medical Branch (https://www.utmb.edu/MSF). Figures were created with BioRender.com
Footnotes
Competing Interest Statement
VDM has filed a patent on the reverse genetic system and reporter SARS-CoV-2. MNV and VDM have filed a provisional patent on a stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Other authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Callaway E. Heavily mutated Omicron variant puts scientists on alert. Nature 600, 21 (2021). 10.1038/d41586-021-03552-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belouzard S., Millet J. K., Licitra B. N. & Whittaker G. R. Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cell Entry Mediated by the Viral Spike Protein. Viruses 4, 1011–1033 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vu M. N. & Menachery V. D. Binding and entering: COVID finds a new home. PLOS Pathogens 17, e1009857 (2021). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Coutard B. et al. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Research 176, 104742 (2020). 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson B. A. et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature (2021). 10.1038/s41586-021-03237-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu Y. et al. Delta spike P681R mutation enhances SARS-CoV-2 fitness over Alpha variant. bioRxiv, 2021.2008.2012.456173 (2021). 10.1101/2021.08.12.456173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Peacock T. P. et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat Microbiol 6, 899–909 (2021). 10.1038/s41564-021-00908-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vu M. N. et al. QTQTN motif upstream of the furin-cleavage site plays a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2205690119 (2022). 10.1073/pnas.2205690119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lau S.-Y. et al. Attenuated SARS-CoV-2 variants with deletions at the S1/S2 junction. Emerging Microbes & Infections 9, 837–842 (2020). 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Escalera A. et al. Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern link to increased spike cleavage and virus transmission. Cell Host & Microbe 30, 373–387.e377(2022). 10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu Y. et al. Delta spike P681R mutation enhances SARS-CoV-2 fitness over Alpha variant. Cell Reports 39 (2022). 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hadfield J. et al. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics 34, 4121–4123 (2018). 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gao C. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Interacts with Multiple Innate Immune Receptors. bioRxiv, 2020.2007.2029.227462 (2020). 10.1101/2020.07.29.227462 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sanda M., Morrison L. & Goldman R. N- and O-Glycosylation of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Anal Chem 93, 2003–2009 (2021). 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie X. et al. An Infectious cDNA Clone of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe 27, 841–848 e843 (2020). 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xie X. et al. Engineering SARS-CoV-2 using a reverse genetic system. Nature Protocols 16, 1761–1784 (2021). 10.1038/s41596-021-00491-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peacock T. P. et al. The altered entry pathway and antigenic distance of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant map to separate domains of spike protein. bioRxiv, 2021.2012.2031.474653 (2022). 10.1101/2021.12.31.474653 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meng B. et al. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. Nature 603, 706–714 (2022). 10.1038/s41586-022-04474-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Phadke K. S., Higdon N. B. A. & Bellaire B. H. In vitro comparison of SARS-CoV-2 variants. bioRxiv, 2023.2003.2011.532212 (2023). 10.1101/2023.03.11.532212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao H. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant shows less efficient replication and fusion activity when compared with Delta variant in TMPRSS2-expressed cells. Emerging Microbes & Infections 11, 277–283 (2022). 10.1080/22221751.2021.2023329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hsieh C.-L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes. Science 369, 1501–1505 (2020). 10.1126/science.abd0826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mustafa Z., Kalbacher H. & Burster T. Occurrence of a novel cleavage site for cathepsin G adjacent to the polybasic sequence within the proteolytically sensitive activation loop of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: The amino acid substitution N679K and P681H of the spike protein. PLOS ONE 17, e0264723 (2022). 10.1371/journal.pone.0264723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yuan S. et al. Pathogenicity, transmissibility, and fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in Syrian hamsters. Science 377, 428–433 (2022). 10.1126/science.abn8939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McCormack C. P. et al. Modelling the viral dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in different cell types. bioRxiv, 2023.2003.2015.529513 (2023). 10.1101/2023.03.15.529513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hui K. P. Y. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo. Nature 603, 715–720 (2022). 10.1038/s41586-022-04479-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carabelli A. M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variant biology: immune escape, transmission and fitness. Nature Reviews Microbiology 21, 162–177 (2023). 10.1038/s41579-022-00841-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Papanikolaou V. et al. From delta to Omicron: S1-RBD/S2 mutation/deletion equilibrium in SARS-CoV-2 defined variants. Gene 814, 146134 (2022). 10.1016/j.gene.2021.146134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shrestha L. B., Foster C., Rawlinson W., Tedla N. & Bull R. A. Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants BA.1 to BA.5: Implications for immune escape and transmission. Reviews in Medical Virology 32, e2381 (2022). 10.1002/rmv.2381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Deming D. et al. Vaccine Efficacy in Senescent Mice Challenged with Recombinant SARS-CoV Bearing Epidemic and Zoonotic Spike Variants. PLOS Medicine 3, e525(2006). 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Harcourt J. et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States. Emerging infectious diseases 26, 1266–1273 (2020). 10.3201/eid2606.200516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson B. A. et al. Nucleocapsid mutations in SARS-CoV-2 augment replication and pathogenesis. PLOS Pathogens 18, e1010627(2022). 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jaworski E. et al. Tiled-ClickSeq for targeted sequencing of complete coronavirus genomes with simultaneous capture of RNA recombination and minority variants. eLife 10, e68479 (2021). 10.7554/eLife.68479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Langmead B. & Salzberg S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods 9, 357–359 (2012). 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Smith T., Heger A. & Sudbery I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res 27, 491–499(2017). 10.1101/gr.209601.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]