Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 19;14:1132543. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1132543

Table 3.

Logistical regression analysis for the association between thyroid hormone sensitivity and HUA in a euthyroid population.

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β (95% CI) p-value β (95% CI) p-value β (95% CI) p-value
Men
TFQI 1.61 (1.34, 1.93) <0.001 1.43 (1.18, 1.73) <0.001 1.38 (1.14, 1.68) 0.001
TT4RI 1.29 (1.18, 1.42) <0.001 1.21 (1.10, 1.33) <0.001 1.19 (1.08, 1.31) <0.001
TSHI 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) 0.002
PTHQI 1.36 (1.21, 1.52) <0.001 1.24 (1.10, 1.40) <0.001 1.22 (1.08, 1.38) 0.002
FT3/FT4 ratio 0.81 (0.27, 2.42) 0.700 0.19 (0.06, 0.60) 0.005 0.11 (0.03, 0.37) <0.001
Women
TFQI 2.06 (1.55, 2.72) <0.001 2.54 (1.90, 3.39) <0.001 2.40 (1.78, 3.23) <0.001
TT4RI 1.34 (1.16, 1.55) <0.001 1.38 (1.19, 1.60) <0.001 1.35 (1.17, 1.57) <0.001
TSHI 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) <0.001 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) <0.001
PTHQI 1.53 (1.28, 1.84) <0.001 1.67 (1.38, 2.02) <0.001 1.62 (1.34, 1.97) <0.001
FT3/FT4 ratio 0.27 (0.04, 1.65) 0.157 0.04 (0.01, 0.28) 0.001 0.03 (0.01, 0.21) <0.001

Model 1: Crude model.

Model 2: Adjusted for age and BMI.

Model 3: Adjusted for age, BMI, diabetes, dyslipidemia, fatty liver, and hypertension.