Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 30;163(3):719–730. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.030

Table 5.

Select Studies of Individuals With an Incidentally Detected Lung Nodule Demonstrating Both Common and Heterogenous Findings

Variable Farjah et al2 Gould et al1 Vachani et al32 Wiener et al33 Gould et al11 Swensen et al10 Tanner et al31 Verdial et al30 Herder et al13 Deppen et al14
Context and setting Population-based Population-based Population-based, nodule > 8 mm Veteran’s Affairs Veteran’s Affairs Referral to quaternary institution Referral to pulmonary clinic Referral to multidisciplinary nodule clinic Referred for PET imaging Referred to thoracic surgery
No. 7,240 68,998 23,780 300 375 629 377 113 106 492
Age,a y 66 63 65 66 66 61 65 NR 64 ± NR 63 ± 13
Women, % 56 56 53 6 2 51 55 58 36 49
Ever smokers, % 56 56 46 86 94 68 73 69 65 77
BMI,a kg/m2 29 NR 28 NR NR NR NR NR NR 28 ± 6
Prior malignancy, % 31 NR NAb NAb 17 NAb NAb 9c 8 37
Nodule size,a mm 7 NR 16 NR 17 13 13 NR NR 28 ± 19
Nodule spiculation, % NR NR NR 11 NR 15 31 26 35 45
Nodule density, %
 Solid NR NR NAd NR NR NR NR 88 NR NR
 Part solid NR NR NAd NR NR NR NR 11 NR NR
 Ground-glass opacity NR NR NAd 13 NR NR NR 3 NR NR
 Multiple nodules, % 57 NR NR NR NA NA NR 61 NR NAa
 Upper lobe location, % 40 NR 38 36 50 44 47 51 58 59
 Lung cancer diagnosis, % 3.7 5.2 9.9 9.0 54 23 25 29 58 78

NA = not available; NR = not reported.

a

All continuous variables summarized by mean values (most commonly reported summary statistic).

b

Not available, because prior malignancy was an exclusion criterion.

c

Frequency of prior malignancy > 5 y prior to nodule detection.

d

Not available, because the frequency of missing data was > 20%.