Table 5.
Select Studies of Individuals With an Incidentally Detected Lung Nodule Demonstrating Both Common and Heterogenous Findings
| Variable | Farjah et al2 | Gould et al1 | Vachani et al32 | Wiener et al33 | Gould et al11 | Swensen et al10 | Tanner et al31 | Verdial et al30 | Herder et al13 | Deppen et al14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Context and setting | Population-based | Population-based | Population-based, nodule > 8 mm | Veteran’s Affairs | Veteran’s Affairs | Referral to quaternary institution | Referral to pulmonary clinic | Referral to multidisciplinary nodule clinic | Referred for PET imaging | Referred to thoracic surgery |
| No. | 7,240 | 68,998 | 23,780 | 300 | 375 | 629 | 377 | 113 | 106 | 492 |
| Age,a y | 66 | 63 | 65 | 66 | 66 | 61 | 65 | NR | 64 ± NR | 63 ± 13 |
| Women, % | 56 | 56 | 53 | 6 | 2 | 51 | 55 | 58 | 36 | 49 |
| Ever smokers, % | 56 | 56 | 46 | 86 | 94 | 68 | 73 | 69 | 65 | 77 |
| BMI,a kg/m2 | 29 | NR | 28 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 28 ± 6 |
| Prior malignancy, % | 31 | NR | NAb | NAb | 17 | NAb | NAb | 9c | 8 | 37 |
| Nodule size,a mm | 7 | NR | 16 | NR | 17 | 13 | 13 | NR | NR | 28 ± 19 |
| Nodule spiculation, % | NR | NR | NR | 11 | NR | 15 | 31 | 26 | 35 | 45 |
| Nodule density, % | ||||||||||
| Solid | NR | NR | NAd | NR | NR | NR | NR | 88 | NR | NR |
| Part solid | NR | NR | NAd | NR | NR | NR | NR | 11 | NR | NR |
| Ground-glass opacity | NR | NR | NAd | 13 | NR | NR | NR | 3 | NR | NR |
| Multiple nodules, % | 57 | NR | NR | NR | NA | NA | NR | 61 | NR | NAa |
| Upper lobe location, % | 40 | NR | 38 | 36 | 50 | 44 | 47 | 51 | 58 | 59 |
| Lung cancer diagnosis, % | 3.7 | 5.2 | 9.9 | 9.0 | 54 | 23 | 25 | 29 | 58 | 78 |
NA = not available; NR = not reported.
All continuous variables summarized by mean values (most commonly reported summary statistic).
Not available, because prior malignancy was an exclusion criterion.
Frequency of prior malignancy > 5 y prior to nodule detection.
Not available, because the frequency of missing data was > 20%.