Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 7;151(1):72e–84e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009798

Table 3:

Statistical analysis of EMD and FD processing results shown in Figure 5.

Outcomes Mean (S.D.) Parametric F test p-value Post-hoc T tests Non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test p-value
MF NF EMD EMD vs. MF EMD vs. NF NF vs. MF
COUNT 898525 (329107) 130613 (103428) 271450 (58106) 0.0010 0.0045 0.6032 0.0012 0.0125
VIABILITY 90.8 (5.2) 90.5 (6.3) 92.6 (4.2) 0.8330 0.8823 0.8406 0.9959 0.7939
Population (%, normalized to MF)
CD34 1.2 (0.3) 2.7 (1.3) 0.0745 0.0745 0.0209
MSC 1.3 (0.1) 1.9 (0.5) 0.0373 0.0373 0.0209
EPC 2.2 (0.2) 5.5 (3.1) 0.0755 0.0755 0.0209
MUSE 1.2 (0.6) 1.6 (0.3) 0.2580 0.2580 0.3865
DPP4 0.8 (0.4) 1.5 (0.4) 0.0393 0.0393 0.0209
Cell number (normalized to MF)
CD34 0.2 (0.2) 0.9 (0.6) 0.0552 0.0552 0.0209
MSC 0.2 (0.1) 0.6 (0.2) 0.0197 0.0197 0.0209
EPC 0.3 (0.2) 1.8 (1.3) 0.0676 0.0676 0.0209
MUSE 0.2 (0.2) 0.5 (0.1) 0.0488 0.0488 0.0833
DPP4 0.1 (0.1) 0.5 (0.2) 0.0139 0.0139 0.0209