Table 2.
Disease binary classification based on individual brain structures.
| Case | Midbrain | Pons | Midbrain/pons | V3 | Caudate | Putamen | Pallidum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal vs. PSP | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| Normal vs. MSA-P | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| Normal vs. MSA-C | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| Normal vs. PD | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| PD vs. PSP | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| PD vs. MSA-P | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
| PD vs. MSA-C | V-Net | |||||||
| UNETR | ||||||||
| FS | ||||||||
Segmentation AUC of CNN-based V-Net, ViT-based UNETR, and FS. Mean ± standard deviation for threefold cross-validation and midbrain-to-pons ratio segmentation are listed.
* indicates a significant difference in AUC between the DL models and FS.
The best result for each volume segmentation method based on FS and DL in binary classification is shown in bold.