Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 23;37(5):3769–3779. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09878-y

Table 3.

Post-implant clinical and objective findings

Recurrent GERD (n = 9) Dysphagia (n = 31) p-value
GERD symptoms
 Heartburn, n (%) 7 (77.8%) 4 (12.9%) 0.0005
 Regurgitation, n (%) 5 (55.6%) 5 (16.1%) 0.0286
 Dysphagia, n (%) 4 (44.4%) 31 (100%) 0.0002
GERD-HRQL score, median (IQR) 18 (6–43.8) 17.5 (13–27.5) 0.7615
Freedom from PPI, n (%) 6 (75.0%) 17 (85.0%) 0.6056
Satisfaction, n (%) 3 (37.5%) 8 (40.0%) 1.0000
DeMeester score, median (IQR)* 20.8 (9.2–42.6) 6.5 (1.7–11.7) 0.0329
pH Normalization, n (%)* 3 (33.3%) 11 (91.7%) 0.0158
Manometric features, median (IQR)†
 LES Length 2.9 (2.5–3.4) 3.3 (2.5–3.8) 0.4185
 Intra-abdominal length 1.3 (0.6–1.9) 2.3 (1.5–2.9) 0.1476
 Resting pressure 25.9 (23.8–31.8) 31.1 (25.1–36.7) 0.2664
 Residual pressure 14.3 (11.0–18.7) 19.2 (17.5–23.2) 0.0156
 Distal contractile integral 1888 (1148–3294) 2144 (1461–4422) 0.6027
 Distal wave amplitude 88.4 (70.8–125.5) 78.0 (47.2–98.1) 0.4665
 Percent peristalsis 100.0 (100.0–100.0) 95.0 (50.0–100.0) 0.0612
 Incomplete bolus clearance 0.0 (0.0–10.0) 40.0 (0.0–60.0) 0.0452

*12 Dysphagia group patients underwent post-implant Bravo

†21 Dysphagia group patients underwent post-implant manometry