Table 4.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Momentary well-being | Momentary withdrawal desire | Momentary well-being | Momentary negative interactions | Momentary well-being | |||||||||||
Predictors | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p | b | 95% CI | p |
Momentary loneliness | -0.34 | -0.36 – -0.33 | < 0.001 | 0.31 | 0.29–0.34 | < 0.001 | 0.20 | 0.18–0.22 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | |||
Others’ presence | 0.12 | 0.09–0.14 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | 0.13 | 0.10–0.15 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Momentary loneliness x Others’ presence | -0.11 | -0.15 – -0.07 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Momentary withdrawal desire | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.27 | -0.28 – -0.25 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Momentary withdrawal desire x Others’ presence | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.20 | -0.24 – -0.16 | < 0.001 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Momentary negative interactions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.31 | -0.32 – -0.29 | < 0.001 |
N individuals | 272 | 272 | 272 | 272 | 272 | ||||||||||
N assessments | 7933 | 7580 | 7579 | 7937 | 7932 |
Note. Others’ presence: 1 = with others, 0 = alone. All predictors were group-mean centered (i.e., within individuals). Model 1 tests whether the effect of momentary loneliness is stronger in others’ presence (vs. alone). Model 2 tests whether momentary loneliness predicts a stronger social withdrawal desire and Model 3 tests whether a stronger momentary withdrawal desire predicts lower well-being and whether this effects is stronger in others’ presence (vs. alone). Model 4 tests whether momentary loneliness predicts more negative social interactions and Model 5 tests whether more negative social interactions predict lower well-being