Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 21;42(4):112295. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112295

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pharmacogenetic silencing and activation of c-MafEX spinal interneurons in naive mice

(A) Schematic illustration of an intersectional DREADD construct.38 DREADD expression (mCherry) was driven by the rAAV.EF1α.Con/Don.hM4Di-mCherry injected into the lumbar spinal cord of c-MafEX mice. Quantification of the percentage of DREADD-expressing cells that co-express c-Maf only (c-MafEX) or c-Maf and Pax2 (c-MafIN) after injection into c-MafEX or c-MafIN mice, respectively (n = 4 mice). Vice versa, the number of c-MafEX or c-MafIN cell that express the DREADD were quantified (n = 4 mice).

(B–G) Behavioral responses after hM4Di-mediated silencing of c-MafEX neurons (hM4Di: c-MafEX: n = 9; control: n = 9; Table S1). Responses to mechanical stimulation (B, E, F), heat (C), cold (D), and motor coordination assessed with the rotarod (G).

(H–M) Behavioral responses after hM3Dq-mediated activation of c-MafEX neurons (hM3Dq: c-MafEX: n = 8; control: n = 5; Table S1). Responses to mechanical (H, K, L), heat (I), and cold (J). (M) Quantification of aversive behavior in c-MafEX and control mice injected with rAAV. EF1α.Con/Don.hM3Dq, 2 h after CNO injection (c-MafEX: n = 8; control: n = 8).

Error bars denote ±SEM. Number of mice and statistics are shown in Table S1. In brief: p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 (B–L: ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons; M: unpaired Student’s t test). Scale bars, 100 μm (overview image) and 10 μm (higher-magnification images).