Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;34(3):e31. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e31

Table 2. Logistic regression of predictive factors for no residual disease after secondary cytoreductive surgery (univariate analysis).

Variables Category No. OR (95% CI) p-value*
Age (yr) Continuous 69 0.98 (0.92–1.04) 0.614
PCI Continuous 49 0.90 (0.81–0.99) 0.042
Disease-free interval Continuous 69 1.01 (0.96–1.06) 0.544
CA125 at recurrence Continuous 63 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.440
Type 1st cytoreduction Residual disease 10 Reference 0.442
No residual disease 54 0.50 (0.08–2.92)
High-grade serous No 15 Reference 0.348
Yes 54 2.80 (0.32–24)
Stage at diagnosis I-II 8 Reference 0.865
III-IV 61 0.82 (0.09–7.53)
ECOG 0 63 8.0 (1.34–47.5) 0.022
1 6 Reference
Peritoneal disease (PET) No 28 Reference 0.510
Yes 41 1.56 (0.40–6.0)
Number of lesions PET ≤2 53 4.36 (1.07–17.7) 0.039
>2 16 Reference
AGO score Negative 9 Reference 0.528
Positive 57 1.75 (0.30–9.97)
iModel Low risk 59 5.57 (1.02–30.2) 0.047
High risk 7 Reference
MSK criteria No 5 Reference 0.012
Offer/Consider 64 12.2 (1.73–86.1)
PET/CT-AGO score Negative 22 Reference 0.193
Positive 47 0.40 (0.10–1.58)
PET/CT-iMODEL Negative 20 Reference 0.028
Positive 49 4.82 (1.18–19.5)
PET/CT-MSK criteria Negative 18 Reference 0.014
Positive 51 5.87 (1.42–24.1)

AGO, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; MSK, Memorial Sloan Kettering; OR, odds ratio; PCI, peritoneal carcinomatosis index; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

*Logistic regression; only cases with recorded PCI>0; Considered positive if at least one of the two models suggested secondary cytoreductive surgery.