Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;38(5):1318–1326. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac262

Table 3:

Number of questionnaire items completed for patients completing PROMIS-D alone versus a two-step method, using a PHQ-2 score ≥1 as the pre-screening cut-off score.

PROMIS-D alone PHQ-2 followed by PHQ-9 PHQ-2 followed by PROMIS D
Results Total number of PROMIS-D items completed Average number of items completed (total number of items/n) Number of PHQ-9 items completed Average number of items completed (total number of items/n) Number of items completed in step 1 Number of items completed in step 2 Total number of items completed in two-step procedure Average number of items completed in two-step procedure (total number of items/n)
PHQ-2 cut off >=1
 Screened out in step 1 of two-step process (n = 263) 1347 5 526 2 526 526 2
 Screened in for second step of two-step process (n = 217) 897 4 1953 9 434 897 1331 6
 Total sample (N = 480) 2244 5 2479 5 960 897 (n = 217) 1857 4