Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 23;118(5):900–904. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002102

Table 1.

Adherence Rates to Established Quality Indicators (Seattle Protocol, Surveillance) and potential metrics (Dysplasia detection rate)

Endoscopist Adherence Rates to Seattle Biopsy Protocol
EGD Volume Number of endoscopists Mean Adherence Rate (SD) 25th / 50th / 75th Percentile
10–19 230 83.3% (23.2) 76.9% / 92.3% / 100%
20–29 146 85.6% (17.5) 80.0% / 92.0% / 100%
≥30 196 86.8% (22.3) 83.9% / 96.5% / 100%
Endoscopist Adherence Rates to Appropriate 3–5 year Surveillance in NDBE
10–14 129 66.6% (SD 33.8) 50.0% / 80.0% / 91.7%
15–24 151 75.5% (26.3) 64.7% / 84.2% / 94.4%
≥25 120 69.8% (29.6) 55.2% / 80.6% / 92.5%
Site Adherence Rates to Seattle Biopsy Protocol
EGD Volume Number of sites Mean Adherence Rate (SD) 25th / 50th / 75th Percentile
20–49 43 76.0% (26.8) 61.5% / 90.0% / 95.8%
50–99 40 77.3% (26.4) 73.3% / 87.2% / 97.0%
100–149 23 86.7% (15.6) 84.4% / 90.8% / 96.4%
≥150 47 88.1% (15.6) 82.7% / 94.2% / 97.6%
Site Adherence Rates to Appropriate 3–5 year Surveillance in NDBE
20–29 29 68.8% (28.6) 56.0% / 78.6% / 90.5%
30–49 32 65.1% (23.9) 52.7% / 69.4% / 83.6%
50–99 37 67.6% (27.1) 63.2% / 76.4% / 86.3%
≥100 38 73.3% (23.1) 63.9% / 81.1% / 89.9%
Endoscopist Dysplasia Detection Rate
EGD Volume Number of endoscopists/sites DDR Mean (SD) Range LGD and HGD (SD) Range
10–19 230 3.28% (6.11)
0–38.46%
1.78% (4.13)
0–30%
20–29 145 3.92% (5.12)
0–22.73%
2.23% (3.63)
0–17.24%
≥30 197 2.91% (4.08)
0–23.53%
1.47% (2.35)
0–13.33%
Site Dysplasia Detection Rate by volume of endoscopies
20–49 42 3.32% (3.69)
0–13.33%
2.23% (2.72)
0–10%
50–99 40 4.01% (4.90)
0–23.73%
2.15% (2.59)
0–12%
100–149 23 2.16% (1.55)
0–6%
1.18% (1.10)
0–3.5%
≥150 47 3.34% (3.11)
0–13.33%
1.7% (1.45)
0–6.31%