Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 20;145(17):9369–9388. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c01000

Table 2. GS and ES Properties of Fe(III) Complexes Used in CT State-Driven Photoredox Catalysis, in Comparison with a Traditional Ir(III)-PCc.

Complex [Fe(III)(btz)3](PF6)3 (11) [Fe(III)(phtmeimb)2]PF6 (12) [Ir(III)(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbpy)]PF6 (3)a
Type of ES LMCT LMCT MLCT
λabs [nm] 558 502 380
εmax [103 · M−1 cm−1] 1.2 3.0 6.2
λem [nm] 600 655 470
τ [ns] 0.10 1.96 2300
Φ [%] 0.03 2.1 68
E1/2(M(IV)/M(III)) [V vs Fc+/0] 1.2 0.25 1.38
E1/2(M(III)/M(II)) [V vs Fc+/0] –0.58 –1.16 –1.68b
E°(M(IV)/*M(III)) [V vs Fc+/0] –1.0 –1.88 –1.20
E°(*M(III)/M(II)) [V vs Fc+/0] 1.60 1.0 0.90
Ref (82) (83) (23)
a

The redox potentials for [Ir(III)(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbpy)]PF6 (3) were converted from V vs saturated calomel electrode (SCE) to V vs Fc+/0 using the value for Fc+/0 vs SCE of +0.31 V cited in the original paper.23

b

Value for E1/2(L/L).

c

All redox potentials are given vs ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/0) in acetonitrile.46 Values for [Fe(btz)3](PF6)3 (11) and [Fe(phtmeimb)2]PF6 (12) were obtained in air-saturated acetonitrile at room temperature.