Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;13:7352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34069-z

Table 3.

Associations of single htSNP in IL1B with lung cancer risk.

Type/modela/rs Genotype Controls 633
n (%)
Cases 627
n (%)
OR (95 CI)b,c P valuec AICd
Whole group: lung cancer
 rs1143633 (A>G)
  Co-dominant A/A 169 (28.2%) 224 (36.4%) 1.00
G/A 311 (51.9%) 289 (47%) 0.68 (0.53–0.89) 0.0044 1651.4
G/G 119 (19.9%) 102 (16.6%) 0.62 (0.44–0.87)
  Dominant A/A 169 (28.2%) 224 (36.4%) 1.00
G/A-G/G 430 (71.8%) 391 (63.6%) 0.67 (0.52–0.85) 0.0012 1649.7
  Recessive A/A-G/A 480 (80.1%) 513 (83.4%) 1.00
G/G 119 (19.9%) 102 (16.6%) 0.78 (0.58–1.05) 0.1 1657.6
  Over-dominant A/A-G/G 288 (48.1%) 326 (53%) 1.00
G/A 311 (51.9%) 289 (47%) 0.81 (0.65–1.02) 0.077 1657.1
  Log-additive 0.77 (0.65–0.91) 0.0021 1650.8
 rs3136558 (T>C)
  Co-dominant T/T 223 (37.2%) 214 (34.8%) 1.00
C/T 296 (49.4%) 293 (47.6%) 1.02 (0.79–1.31) 0.079 1657.2
C/C 80 (13.4%) 108 (17.6%) 1.46 (1.03–2.06)
  Dominant T/T 223 (37.2%) 214 (34.8%) 1.00
C/T-C/C 376 (62.8%) 401 (65.2%) 1.11 (0.88–1.41) 0.38 1659.5
  Recessive T/T-C/T 519 (86.6%) 507 (82.4%) 1.00
C/C 80 (13.4%) 108 (17.6%) 1.44 (1.05–1.98) 0.025 1655.2
  Over-dominant T/T-C/C 303 (50.6%) 322 (52.4%) 1.00
C/T 296 (49.4%) 293 (47.6%) 0.91 (0.73–1.15) 0.44 1659.6
  Log-additive 1.16 (0.99–1.37) 0.073 1657
 rs1143630 (C>A)
  Co-dominant C/C 422 (70%) 407 (66.9%) 1.00
A/C 164 (27.2%) 190 (31.2%) 1.19 (0.92–1.53) 0.21 1655.7
A/A 17 (2.8%) 11 (1.8%) 0.67 (0.31–1.46)
  Dominant C/C 422 (70%) 407 (66.9%) 1.00
A/C-A/A 181 (30%) 201 (33.1%) 1.14 (0.89–1.46) 0.29 1655.7
  Recessive C/C-A/C 586 (97.2%) 597 (98.2%) 1.00
A/A 17 (2.8%) 11 (1.8%) 0.64 (0.29–1.38) 0.25 1655.5
  Over-dominant C/C-A/A 439 (72.8%) 418 (68.8%) 1.00
A/C 164 (27.2%) 190 (31.2%) 1.21 (0.94–1.55) 0.15 1654.7
  Log-additive 1.07 (0.86–1.33) 0.54 1656.5
Histopahtology subgroup: lung squamous cell carcinomae
 rs1143633 (A>G)
  Log-additive 0.59 (0.47–0.75) < 0.0001 980.8
rs3136558 (T>C)
  Log-additive 1.35 (1.08–1.69) 0.0086 994.5

aDominant model: AB (Heterozygote) + BB (Homozygous variant-type) versus AA (Homozygous wild-type), Recessive model: BB versus AA + AB, Co-dominant model: AB versus AA and BB versus AA, Over-dominant model: AB versus AA + BB, Log-additive model: Analysis of trend where AA is ‘0’, AB is ‘1’ and BB is ‘2’.

bOR (odd ratio), 95% CI (95% confidence interval), adjusted for smoking duration.

cBoldface indicates statistical significance.

dAkaike’s Information Criterion.

eOnly list the best significant models.