Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;95(1136):20201289. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201289

Table 2.

Toxicity and survival rates for cervical cancer patients for retrospective and prospective study designs

[ref] Study design Period of study N Prescription RT technique Median follow-up Outcomes- Toxicity Outcomes- Survival
58 Retrospective 01/2013–12/2014 18 PTV 50.4 Gy in 28 F VMAT:2 6 MV coplanar mono-isocentric arcs 30.5 months (IQR:
13–36.25 months).
Acute haematologic toxicity
Haemoglobin
G0: 23.5%
G1: 17.7%
G2: 58.8%
TLC
G0: 47%
G1: 35.5%
G2: 17.7%
Platelets
G0: 88.2%
G1: 5.9%
G2: 5.9%
OS 72.2% (95%CI: 62.1–80.5%)
DFS
2 year DFS was 63.3% (95% CI:
52.8–72.4%)
59 Retrospective 12/2010–05/2017
IMRT:
12/2010–09/2012
VMAT: 05/2013–05/2017
398 Phase I: whole pelvis VMAT or IMRT 45/25F or 50 Gy/28F
25–28
Phase II:
Lymph node boost up to 60–70 Gy
IMRT (n = 67)
VMAT (n = 331)
IMRT 35.07
(range, 4.80–90.37) months
VMAT 25.47
(range, 0.93–58.93) months
VMAT group, the incidence of Grade 3
and four acute anaemia/erythropenia were 3.6 and 0.9%.
acute Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia were 8.5 and 0.6%
IMRT
3 year OS: 76.2%
3 year DFS: 76.4%
3 year LC: 83.1%
3 year DMFS: 86.1%
VMAT
3 year OS 80.5%
3 year DFS 65.4%
3 year LC 88.7%
3 year DMFS 78.1%.
CCRT vs non-CCRT
3 year OS in the
CCRT 84.8vs 65.4% non-CCRT (p = 0.005)
57 Multicentre randomised control trial 11/2012–08/2015 278 Phase I
45 Gy/25F or 50.4 Gy/28F
IMRT- (inverse planning approaches: IMRT,
VMAT, and tomotherapy) (n = 129)
3DCRT (Four field box technique) (n = 149)
Acute effects assessed during treatment Physician Reported Outcomes
No Grade 5 AE
Grade 3 and 4 AEs: 16.4%(IMRT);11.0% (3DCRT) (p = 0.28)
GI AEs
Acute Grade 2 GI AEs (IMRT- 26.2% v 3DCRT- 22.1%; p = 0.43).
Patient reported outcomes
Mean decrease- EPIC urinary summary score (wk3 and 5 compared with baseline)
3 week results
IMRT (26.0 [SD, 14.5] v 22.5 [SD, 11.3]; p = 0.04
5 week results
IMRT −210.4 [SD, 17.5] v 3DCRT 25.6 [SD, 15.3]; p = 0.03
EPIC urinary score at 5 weeks favoured the IMRT arm
(estimate, 24.59; SD, 2.19; p = 0.04)
Not analyzed
60 Prospective study 09/2011–04/2015 30 Macroscopic disease 66 Gy/30F;
Pelvis 54 Gy/30F
SIB-VMAT technique two 3600_ arcs with 6 MV 32 months
(range: 8–50 months)
Acute GI toxicity
G0- 30%; G1-23%; G2-43%
Late GI toxicity
G0-70%; G1- 30%
Acute Urinary
G0-23%; G1-40%; G2-37%
Late urinary
G0-90%; G1-10%
Acute Vaginal
G0-7%; G1-63%; G2-23%
Late vaginal toxicity
G0-77%; G1-23%
Acute Rectal toxicity
G0-47%; G1-30%; G2-23%
Late Rectal toxicity
G0-73%; G1-20%
Acute Hematologic
G0-70%; G1-30%
Late Hematologic
G0-87%; G1-13%
3 year OS- 93%
3 year LC 80%,
Clinical outcomes by stage (II vs III)
3 year OS Stage II- 100%
3 year OS Stage III- 85%
3 year LC (Stg II) 91%
3 year LC (Stg III) 67%
61 Retrospective 01/2007–12/2016 123 45 Gy/25F or 50.4 Gy/28F 3DCRT
IMRT
VMAT
Tomotherapy
32.2 months Not assessed Survival rates < 70 years vs >70 years
3 year OS 63.9vs 50.6%
5 year OS
60.4vs 39.1 %
3 year CSS
68.2vs 70.9%
5 year CSS
78.2vs 82.1 %
3 year LRRFS
82.8vs 82.1%
5 year LRRFS
78.2vs 82.1%
3 year LRFS
85.3vs 82.1%
5 year LRFS
82.6vs 82.1%

Terms: 3DCRT, 3D conformal radiotherapy; AE, adverse events; CSS, cancer-specific survival; DFS, disease free survival; DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival; EPIC, expanded prostate cancer index composite; IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy; LRRFS, locoregional recurrence-free survival; OS, overall survival; PRO-CTCAE, the Patient-Reported Outcomes–Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; TLC, total leukocyte count; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy