Skip to main content
. 2023 May 4;2023(5):CD013854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013854.pub2

Walkiewicz 2011.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: prospective RCT
Study duration: NR
Setting: IBD clinic
Participants State of disease at beginning of study per IG/CG: NR
Disease type per IG/CG: IBD (UC and CD) Specific figures NR in abstract
Inclusion criteria: NR
Exclusion: NR
Age at beginning of study per IG/CG: age range 11‐21 years
Sex per IG/CG: NR
Disease duration per IC/CG: NR
Number randomised per IG/CG: total randomised 36
Number reaching end of study per IG/CG: NR
Interventions IG:
IG1: "Internet blog access"
IG2: "the receipt of text messaging"
IG3: "combination of Internet blog access and text messaging"
CG: standard care
Outcomes Duration of follow‐up: 3 months
Primary outcomes as defined by study authors: disease‐related knowledge assessed using a modified version of the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) Knowledge Score (I‐M‐AWARE)
Secondary outcomes as defined by study authors: NR
Notes Funding source: NR
Conflicts of interest: NR
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Only the abstract was available as contact person for the study said he no longer has access to the study.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk It is not possible to blind the participants to the intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Results presented in the abstract are reflective of the outcomes mentioned in the method section but the data is not clearly presented per group
Other bias Unclear risk No information on baseline characteristics (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore). No other concerns.