Walkiewicz 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: prospective RCT Study duration: NR Setting: IBD clinic |
|
Participants |
State of disease at beginning of study per IG/CG: NR Disease type per IG/CG: IBD (UC and CD) Specific figures NR in abstract Inclusion criteria: NR Exclusion: NR Age at beginning of study per IG/CG: age range 11‐21 years Sex per IG/CG: NR Disease duration per IC/CG: NR Number randomised per IG/CG: total randomised 36 Number reaching end of study per IG/CG: NR |
|
Interventions |
IG: IG1: "Internet blog access" IG2: "the receipt of text messaging" IG3: "combination of Internet blog access and text messaging" CG: standard care |
|
Outcomes |
Duration of follow‐up: 3 months Primary outcomes as defined by study authors: disease‐related knowledge assessed using a modified version of the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) Knowledge Score (I‐M‐AWARE) Secondary outcomes as defined by study authors: NR |
|
Notes |
Funding source: NR Conflicts of interest: NR |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Only the abstract was available as contact person for the study said he no longer has access to the study. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | It is not possible to blind the participants to the intervention |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Results presented in the abstract are reflective of the outcomes mentioned in the method section but the data is not clearly presented per group |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information on baseline characteristics (abstract only and author responded they have no access to the study data anymore). No other concerns. |