Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2023 Apr 4;329(13):1059–1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1956

Table.

Monitoring for Unintended Consequences of the Rural Emergency Hospital Care Model

Domain Anticipated benefit Potential unintended consequences Early signs of unintended consequences
Ensuring access Preserve outpatient and emergency services Greater travel burden for patients to obtain inpatient care
Delays in patients receiving inpatient care
Changes in patient travel distance to care
Rates of emergency presentations for access-sensitive conditions
Facilitating transfers Align patient care needs with facility resources Difficulty for rural hospitals to identify an accepting hospital with inpatient services
Overburden nonrural hospitals with increased inpatient volume
Increased rates of delayed or rejected transfers
Limited bed capacity at receiving hospitals
Strengthening continuity of care Strengthen relationships and disseminate expertise Fragmented care across multiple sites and multiple clinicians
Redundant care leading to higher care utilization
Patients with care across sites without interoperable electronic health records
Duplicate testing across sites of care
Maintaining a rural workforce Maintain outpatient and emergency workforce Difficulty recruiting outpatient clinicians who also need inpatient resources
Less overall infrastructure to recruit outpatient clinicians
Loss of clinicians who provide inpatient and outpatient services
Increase vacancies for outpatient clinicians