Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2023 Apr 14;240:105263. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105263

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A) shows functional connectivity broken down by Age Group, Connectivity Type, and Task Condition. Significant main effects of Connectivity Type (Within MD > Within Language > Between Language-MD) and marginally significant main effects of Task Condition (No-Go Bias > Go Bias) and Age Group (Younger Adults > Older Adults) are shown. There was also a significant interaction between Connectivity Type and Age Group, indicating that the age effect on connectivity was only significant in the within language network connectivity. B) shows the significant interaction between Connectivity Type and Task Condition. The direction of the condition effect was different in the within MD network connectivity (No-Go Bias > Go Bias > All Go), compared to the within language and the between network connectivities (Go Bias being the lowest). Box plots represent median and quartile.