Skip to main content
. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD011856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011856.pub2

Alonso‐Colmenero 2010.

Methods Country: Spain, Madrid
Setting: Hospital
Design: Uncontrolled before‐and‐after study
Analysis: Chi² test, t‐tests, Mann‐Whitney and multivariate logistic regression analyses
Participants 1189 patients admitted during June and July 2005 (pre) and June and July 2006 (post). 184 current smokers identified (15.4%). 135 smokers agreed to participate in study: completed survey of smoking habits, social status and consumption of snuff. Pre‐ban n = 73, post‐ban n = 62
n = 55 smokers actively smoked in hospital during study period
Aged: 18 years and older
Interventions National smoke‐free ban 2nd August 2005. Commenced in hospital 26th December 2005. Hospital policy not described. National policy not described
Outcomes Effect of smoking ban on smoking prevalence of inpatients during hospital stay
Variables associated with tobacco use in hospital
Notes National Ban: Yes
National indoor smoking ban enacted 1st January 2006 banned direct and indirect tobacco publicity and sponsorship, it reduced points of sale, and it banned smoking in enclosed workplaces and public spaces, with exemptions in the restaurant and hospitality sector (Partial ban at time of study).
Biochemical verification: CO‐oximetry
Follow‐up period: 12 months
Smokers were considered to be patients who admitted to smoking in the hospital ( or using snuff) and/or those with a CO‐oximeter result > 6 ppm
Translated paper
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Not applicable
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Not applicable
Sampling bias (selection bias) Unclear risk Volunteers agreeing to participate
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not applicable
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Self‐reported smoking status
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unknown. Data for 135 smokers only
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Smokers combined for analysis vs nonsmokers and not pre‐ and post‐ban analysis
Other bias High risk Small sample size
Recruitment from small number of clinics
Other antismoking activities ongoing