Alonso‐Colmenero 2010.
Methods | Country: Spain, Madrid Setting: Hospital Design: Uncontrolled before‐and‐after study Analysis: Chi² test, t‐tests, Mann‐Whitney and multivariate logistic regression analyses |
|
Participants | 1189 patients admitted during June and July 2005 (pre) and June and July 2006 (post). 184 current smokers identified (15.4%). 135 smokers agreed to participate in study: completed survey of smoking habits, social status and consumption of snuff. Pre‐ban n = 73, post‐ban n = 62 n = 55 smokers actively smoked in hospital during study period Aged: 18 years and older |
|
Interventions | National smoke‐free ban 2nd August 2005. Commenced in hospital 26th December 2005. Hospital policy not described. National policy not described | |
Outcomes | Effect of smoking ban on smoking prevalence of inpatients during hospital stay Variables associated with tobacco use in hospital |
|
Notes | National Ban: Yes National indoor smoking ban enacted 1st January 2006 banned direct and indirect tobacco publicity and sponsorship, it reduced points of sale, and it banned smoking in enclosed workplaces and public spaces, with exemptions in the restaurant and hospitality sector (Partial ban at time of study). Biochemical verification: CO‐oximetry Follow‐up period: 12 months Smokers were considered to be patients who admitted to smoking in the hospital ( or using snuff) and/or those with a CO‐oximeter result > 6 ppm Translated paper |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Not applicable |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Not applicable |
Sampling bias (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Volunteers agreeing to participate |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not applicable |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Self‐reported smoking status |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unknown. Data for 135 smokers only |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Smokers combined for analysis vs nonsmokers and not pre‐ and post‐ban analysis |
Other bias | High risk | Small sample size Recruitment from small number of clinics Other antismoking activities ongoing |