Table 2.
Most relevant rules (based on: confidence)
| Rank | Condition | Prediction | Sorting by confidence (%) |
Other assessment statistics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conditional support (%) |
Rule support (%) |
Lift | Deployability (%) | ||||||||
| 1 | Cyanotic tongue | Gastric antrum mucosal hyperemia or edema | 100.00 | 5.75 | 5.75 | 1.30 | 0.00 | ||||
| 2 | Cyanotic tongue | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 100.00 | 5.75 | 5.75 | 1.24 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | Slippery fur | Gastric antrum mucosal hyperemia or edema | 93.33 | 8.62 | 8.05 | 1.21 | 0.57 | ||||
| 4 | Yellow fur | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 90.00 | 11.49 | 10.34 | 1.12 | 1.15 | ||||
| 5 | Spotted tongue | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 87.76 | 28.16 | 24.71 | 1.09 | 3.45 | ||||
| 6 | Slippery fur | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 86.67 | 8.62 | 7.47 | 1.08 | 1.15 | ||||
| 7 | L2 (30, 60) | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 85.71 | 48.28 | 41.38 | 1.07 | 6.90 | ||||
| 8 | Yellow fur | Gastric antrum mucosal hyperemia or edema | 85.00 | 11.49 | 9.77 | 1.10 | 1.72 | ||||
| 9 | Tooth-marked tongue | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 83.33 | 79.31 | 66.09 | 1.04 | 13.22 | ||||
| 10 | b2 (5, 20) | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 82.86 | 60.34 | 50.00 | 1.03 | 10.34 | ||||
| 11 | a1 (0, 20) | Gastric antrum mucosal hyperemia or edema | 82.61 | 26.44 | 21.84 | 1.07 | 4.60 | ||||
| 12 | a1 (0, 20) | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 82.61 | 26.44 | 21.84 | 1.03 | 4.60 | ||||
| 13 | Spotted tongue | Gastric antrum mucosal hyperemia or edema | 81.63 | 28.16 | 22.99 | 1.06 | 5.17 | ||||
| 14 | a2 (15, 35) | Gastric antrum mucosal erythema / macula | 81.03 | 66.67 | 54.02 | 1.01 | 12.64 | ||||
Notes: a1: the range of tongue body color from red to green; a2: the range of tongue coating color from red to green; b2: the range of tongue coating color from yellow to blue; L2: the brightness of the tongue coating color.