Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;3(2):100205. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100205

Table 3.

Patient satisfaction within the low-risk and high-risk preeclampsia sample

High-risk variables Low-risk (n=297) High-risk (n=50)
Satisfaction with counseling received (≥7), n (%) 248 (86.7) 34 (73.9)
Counseling received was very informative (≥7), n (%) 236 (85.2) 34 (72.3)
Care received was quick and efficient (≥7), n (%) 254 (91.4) 41 (87.2)
Counseling received was easy to understand (≥7), n (%) 251 (90.9) 36 (78.3)
Staff was kind and accommodating (≥7), n (%) 266 (95.7) 41 (87.2)
My questions about PE risk were properly addressed (≥7), n (%) 258 (94.5) 35 (74.5)
Counseling about prevention of PE (aspirin) was informative (≥7), n (%) 34 (91.9)
Care received about prevention of PE (aspirin) was quick and efficient (≥7), n (%) 37 (82.2)
Counseling about prevention of PE (aspirin) was easy to understand (≥7), n (%) 35 (77.8)

PE, preeclampsia.

Silang. First-trimester preeclampsia screening and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol Glob Rep 2023.