. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 8.

Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2022 Aug 29;49(1):33–48. doi: 10.1002/ab.22051

TABLE 4.

Fit indices and χ² values for confirmatory factor analyses

	AIC	BIC	χ ²	df	RMSEA	90% CI	CFI	TLI	SRMR	χ ² _diff	df _diff	p
Study 2
Model 1: Three factor	3846.64	3969.85	137.08^***	83	0.09	0.07, 0.11	0.93	0.91	0.07	–	–	–
Model 2: One factor	3927.95	4944.05	195.46^***	86	0.13	0.11, 0.15	0.85	0.82	0.11	21.18	3	<.001
Model 3: Two factor	3915.56	4034.03	187.31^***	85	0.12	0.10, 0.14	0.86	0.83	0.10	22.78	2	<.001
Study 3
Model 1: Three factor	10233.18	10409.88	171.02^***	83	0.08	0.06, 0.10	0.93	0.91	0.05	–	–	–
Model 2: One factor	10371.46	10537.97	278.58^***	86	0.12	0.10, 0.13	0.84	0.80	0.08	92.01	3	<.001
Model 3: Two factor	10311.98	10481.89	233.16^***	85	0.09	0.08, 0.10	0.88	0.85	0.07	56.15	2	<.001
Study 4
Model 1: Three factor	4400.45	4529.86	116.03^*	83	0.07	0.04, 0.09	0.95	0.94	0.06	–	–	–
Model 2: One factor	4477.91	4599.85	190.17^***	86	0.12	0.10, 0.14	0.84	0.80	0.10	150.44	3	<.001
Model 3: Two factor	4464.24	4588.67	175.24^***	85	0.11	0.09, 0.13	0.87	0.84	0.09	104.17	2	<.001

Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; CFI, comparative fit index; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean squared residual; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index.

^***

p < .001.

p < .05.