. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;67(4):474–483. doi: 10.1037/rep0000458

Table 5.

Preliminary Efficacy of VICT Program Assessed by NIH Toolbox Composite Scores

TBI Severity	Visit	Condition	Mean	SD	p	Hedges’ g	95% CI of g
Mild Complicated	Baseline	Intervention	99.00	10.15	0.85	−0.11	−6.58, 6.35
	Baseline	Control	100.27	9.71	0.85	−0.11	−6.58, 6.35

	Post	Intervention	85.67	11.41	0.05	−1.59	−8.25, 5.08
	Post	Control	103.20	8.58	0.05	−1.59	−8.25, 5.08

	Follow-up	Intervention	91.11	12.17	0.39	−0.59	−8.68, 7.50
	Follow-up	Control	99.00	11.42	0.39	−0.59	−8.68, 7.50

Moderate-Severe	Baseline	Intervention	83.52	10.23	0.72	0.18	−5.60, 5.95
	Baseline	Control	81.31	13.58	0.72	0.18	−5.60, 5.95

	Post	Intervention	87.24	6.48	0.91	0.06	−5.96, 6.07
	Post	Control	86.52	14.89	0.91	0.06	−5.96, 6.07

	Follow-up	Intervention	96.46	8.87	0.41	0.42	−5.15, 6.00
	Follow-up	Control	91.57	13.09	0.41	0.42	−5.15, 6.00

Note. Hedge’s g was calculated as an unbiased measure of effect sizes with higher values indicating larger group differences using the following guidelines: small (Hedges’ g: 0.15~0.4), medium (Hedges’ g: 0.4~0.75), large (Hedges’ g: >0.75)