. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 26.

Published in final edited form as: Scand J Pain. 2022 Mar 16;22(3):587–596. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0174

Table 3.

Indirect Tests for the Trait Activation Model of Pain Catastrophizing

				95% CI
Dependent Variable	Path Tested	Effect	SE	Lower	Upper
Electric Tolerance (mA)	Cˈ	3.741	2.634	−1.450	8.932
Electric Tolerance (mA)	Indirect (ab)*	−2.188	1.271	−4.851	.178
Heat Tolerance (C°)	Cˈ	−.044	.337	−.710	.621
Heat Tolerance (C°)	Indirect (ab)*	.066	.150	−.221	.364
Cold Tolerance (Log[s+1])	Cˈ	.175	.071	.036	.315
Cold Tolerance (Log[s+1])	**Indirect (ab)***	−.158	.039	−.241	−.088
Ischemia Tolerance (Log[s+1])	Cˈ	.077	.081	−.081	.236
Ischemia Tolerance (Log[s+1])	**Indirect (ab)***	−.126	.038	−.206	−.050

Note. Cˈ=direct effect. a*b =indirect effect. SE = Standard Error. s=seconds. CI = confidence Interval for indirect effects were bootstrapped at 10000 samples. Bolded effects are significantly different from 0. Sex and BMI were included as covariates.