Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;27(3):137.e1–137.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.03.004

Table 3.

Retinopathy of prematurity severity in neonates requiring treatment across all time periodsa

Study parameter All time periods
Nb = 144
Time period 1c n = 23b Time period 2 n = 41b Time period 3 n = 44b Time period 4 n = 36b P valued
Zone of ROP at treatment, no. (%)
 1 27 (18.8) 1 (4.4) 14 (34.1) 7 (15.0) 5 (13.9) 0.03
 2 95 (66.0) 19 (82.6) 21 (51.2) 27 (61.4) 28 (77.8)
 3 13 (9.0) 3 (13.0) 2 (4.9) 6 (13.6) 2 (5.6)
 Not reported 9 (6.3) 0 4 (9.8) 4 (9.1) 1 (2.8)
Stage of ROP at treatment, no. (%)
 1 7 (4.9) 1 (4.3) 2 (4.9) 2 (4.5) 2 (5.6) 0.63
 2 19 (13.2) 3 (13.0) 2 (4.9) 7 (15.0) 7 (19.4)
 3 99 (68.8) 14 (60.9) 33 (80.5) 28 (63.6) 24 (66.7)
 4 2 (1.4) 1 (4.3 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2.8)
 5 1 (0.7) 0 (0) 1 (2.4) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Not reported 16 (11.1)
AROP, no. (%) 36 (25) 0 (0) 19 (46.3) 8 (18.2) 9 (25.0) <0.01e
Plus disease, no. (%) 98 (68.1) 12 (52.2) 32 (78.1) 22 (50.0) 32 (88.9) 0.01f

AROP, aggressive retinopathy of prematurity; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

a

Time periods: (1) November 1, 2018, to March 15, 2019; (2) March 16, 2019, to August 2, 2019; (3) November 1, 2019, to March 15, 2020; (4) March 16, 2020, to August 2, 2020 (lockdown period).

b

Number of patients

c

Data available for 4/7 institutions.

d

A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

e

Significant difference between time period 1 and 2 (P < 0.01), 1 and 3 (P = 0.02), and 1 and 4 (P < 0.01)

f

Significant difference between time period 1 and 2 (P = 0.03), 1 and 4 (P < 0.01), 2 and 3 (P = 0.02), and 3 and 4 (P < 0.01).