Table 1.
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
Magnetic resonance imaging | 1. High resolution images 2. Objective measures; not dependent on operator 3. Captures wide area of muscle 4. Has been widely used in IIM |
1. May not be widely available 2. Expensive 3. Takes a relatively longer time to complete than other modalities 4. Lack of standardized protocol for muscle imaging 5. Lack of widely accepted and easily available quantification |
Ultrasound | 1. Easily accessible 2. Can be performed at bedside/clinic setting 3. Rapid screening |
1. Limited by the skill of the operator 2. Quality of the image can be limited by anatomy and muscle depth 3. Muscle edema may result in too small a change in echogenicity |
Electrical impedance myography | 1. Less resource intensive 2. Minimal post-processing required 3. Rapid screening 4. Can be performed at bedside/clinic setting |
1. Still a research tool and not widely available 2. Only provides quantified values, but no images 3. The interpretation of numerical parameters is not well-established in the clinical setting |