Table 6.

Pairwise Mann-Whitney tests for those variables that reached significance in Tables 3 to 5. The italicized P values are significant.

Characteristics	TSTMa vs TCb					TSTM vs CGc					TC vs CG
	Mann-Whitney test	η2	P value	Direction of difference	Mann-Whitney test		η2	P value	Direction of difference	Mann-Whitney test		η2	P value	Direction of difference
ATENTO (self-report): time orientation	219	0.068	.01	TC>TSTM	519		<0.001	.94	—d	273		0.058	.02	TC>CG
ATENTO (self-report): school context	315	0.007	.43	—	357.5		0.055	.03	TSTM>CG	328.5		0.023	.16	—
EQ-i:YVe: positive impression	261	0.034	.08	TC>TSTM	351		0.060	.02	CG>TSTM	402		0.001	.78	—
EQ-i:YV: interpersonal	340	0.001	.73	—	397.5		0.032	.09	CG>TSTM	286.5		0.048	.04	—
Conners’ CPT-3f detectability	219	0.068	.01	TC>TSTM	428.5		0.018	.20	—	356.5		0.011	.33	—
Conners’ CPT-3 perseverations	234	0.056	.03	TC>TSTM	427.5		0.019	.19	—	348.5		0.015	.25	—
Conners’ CPT-3 reaction time variability (hits)	224	0.063	.02	TC>TSTM	402.5		0.029	.11	—	335		0.019	.19	—
Conners’ CPT-3 block change	290	0.017	.22	—	370.5		0.047	.04	CG>TSTM	265.5		0.064	.02	CG>TC
Conners’ CPT-3 inter stimulus change	215.5	0.071	.01	TC>TSTM	334		0.071	.01	CG>TSTM	359		0.010	.35	—

^aTSTM: The Secret Trail of Moon.

^bTC: Therapeutic Chess.

^cCG: control group.

^dNot applicable.

^eEQ-i:YV Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version.

^fCPT-3: Continuous Performance Test 3.