Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;2023(5):CD013350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013350.pub2

Thomas 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: Cluster randomized controlled trial
Country: India
Setting: Chennai City zones where TB investigations and treatment are offered through the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP)
Eligibility criteria: Included were zones with TB investigations and treatment offered through the RNTCP in Chennai. Participants were included if they were new TB patients, 18 years and older who were registered for an anti‐tuberculosis treatment.
Duration of follow‐up: 6‐months
Informed consent: All participants provided written informed consent
Ethical approvals: Study procedures were approved by the National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, the Indian Council of Medical Research, and Chennai Corporation
Participants Sample size: 298 (113 alcohol counseling, 185 usual care)
Description of the target population: Patients with tuberculosis
Age: 44 years
Sex: Not reported
Race/Ethnicity: Not reported
Marital status: 72% married
Harmful alcohol use (baseline): 37% hazardous alcohol use, 20% harmful use, 33% dependence
Co‐occurring disorders: 76% were new cases of tuberculosis, 24% were retreatment cases
Interventions Type: Non‐pharmacologic
Description: Alcohol counseling including discussion of the relationship between alcohol and tuberculosis, and the effect of alcohol on physical health, family and society.
Duration and frequency: Four 45‐60 minute sessions at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months
Delivery and provider: Trained lay counselor
Comparison group: Usual care for tuberculosis without alcohol counseling
Outcomes Primary outcome(s): Alcohol consumption
Primary outcome measurement tool(s): AUDIT
Secondary outcome(s): Adherence to anti‐tuberculosis treatment
Secondary outcome measurement tool(s): Regular adherence, irregular adherence, or lost to follow‐up
Time points: 0 and 6 months
Notes Study funding and conflicts of interest: UNAIDS
Linked study records: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "This was a pilot, two‐arm, parallel‐cluster randomised trial carried out in four zones (TB units) where TB investigations and treatment are offered through the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). The four zones were divided into two strata, two of which were high‐prevalence and two were low‐prevalence zones. Within each stratum, one zone was allocated to the intervention arm and the other to the control arm. Here the zones were the units of randomisation (clusters)" Pg. 948
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk "For administrative purposes, Chennai City is divided into 10 corporation zones and 155 divisions. This was a pilot, two‐arm, parallel‐cluster randomised trial carried out in four zones (TB units) where TB investigations and treatment are offered through the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP). The four zones were divided into two strata, two of which were high‐prevalence and two were low‐prevalence zones. Within each stratum, one zone was allocated to the intervention arm and the other to the control arm. Here the zones were the units of randomisation (clusters)" Pg. 948
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants and personnel cannot be blinded for this type of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Outcomes reported by participant not blind to intervention
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk "Information on overall treatment adherence was available for 104 (92%) intervention group participants and for 173 (94%) control group participants." Pg. 950
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Does not provide quantitative results by alcohol risk level.