Skip to main content
. 2023 May 9;2023(5):CD012660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012660.pub2

Knupfer 2001.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling Cross‐sectional study, consecutive sampling
Patient characteristics and setting Sample size: 135
Gestational age: preterm (23–36 weeks)
Race/ethnicity: "Caucasians" (presumed white) and Asians
Prior phototherapy: in some infants
Setting: obstetrics department and NICU at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Index tests TcB Device: BiliChek
Site of TcB measurement: forehead 
Target condition and reference standard(s) Target condition: neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia
TSB measurement method: diazo method (unclear if reference standard interpreted without knowledge of results of index test)
Flow and timing Time interval between tests: not reported
Number of paired results: 400
Comparative  
Notes .
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Low risk