Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;2023(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub8

Summary of findings 5. Varenicline versus bupropion for smoking cessation.

Varenicline versus bupropion for smoking cessation
Patient or population: people who smoke tobacco
Setting: smoking cessation clinics, hospitals, universities and other research centres
Intervention: varenicline
Comparison: bupropion
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with bupropion Corresponding risk with varenicline
Smoking abstinence at longest follow‐up (6+ months)
 
177 per 1000 241 per 1000
(222 to 264)
RR 1.36
(1.25 to 1.49)
7560
(9 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
 
SAEs
 
20 per 1000 18 per 1000
(12 to 27)
RR 0.89
(0.61 to 1.31)
5317
(5 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝a
Low
 
Neuropsychiatric SAEs
 
2 per 1000 2 per 1000
(0 to 16)
RR 1.05
(0.16 to 7.04)
866
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝a
Low
 
Cardiac SAEs
 
0 per 1000 0 per 1000
(0 to 0)
RR 3.17
(0.33 to 30.18)
866
(2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝a
Low
 
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). The assumed risk in the comparison group is calculated as the median risk in control groups.

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; SAE: serious adverse event
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded two levels because of imprecision: CI incorporates clinically significant benefit and clinically significant harm.