Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;2023(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub8

Littlewood 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Country: USA
Setting: at home with in‐person study visits (unclear setting)
Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of varenicline for SC, and examine the influence of psychological factors on treatment outcome
Study design: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, RCT
Participants 205 current cigarette smokers interested in quitting, 34% female, mean age 34, baseline average CPD 16
Interventions
  • Placebo

  • Varenicline ‐ 2 x 1 mg/day (titrated for first week)


Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Interventions lasted 12 weeks. All participants received in‐person interactive behavioural support, comprising a 30‐min baseline counselling session and a 10‐20‐min follow‐up at weeks 2, 6, and 12. 
Outcomes
  • CA for the past month, biochemically confirmed with exhaled CO < 6 ppm

  • Average number CPD

  • 7‐day PPA

Notes New for 2022 update
Funding by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 1R01DA025074‐01A2. 
Author declaration of interests: "The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest."
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Urn‐randomisation used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "In order to maintain the blind, the pharmacist controlled the pre‐generated urn randomization schedule and packed varenicline tablets in opaque capsules
with microcrystalline cellulose, an inert powder commonly used in packaging medications."
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Participants and staff measuring the outcome were blinded to allocation. Abstinence biochemically validated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk 52% of participants lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No trial registration but reports expected outcomes