Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;2023(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub8

Nakamura 2007.

Study characteristics
Methods Country: Japan
Setting: 19 study sites
Aim: to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of 3 doses of varenicline over 12 weeks
Dates conducted: not stated
Study design: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group RCT
Participants 619 healthy Japanese adult volunteers, aged 20‐75, smoking ≥ 10 CPD. Allocated to varenicline 0.25 mg x 2/day (153), 0.5 mg x 2/day (156), 1.0 mg x 2/day (156) or placebo x 2/day (154). 1 participant withdrew before treatment, and is excluded from ITT denominator. 1 road traffic accident death removed from varenicline group at 52 weeks
Participants stratified by level of nicotine dependence, measured by Tobacco Dependence Screener scale (≥ 5) and by FTND. 515 (83.3%) classified as nicotine‐dependent
Demographic data only supplied for nicotine‐dependent group (515/618): 75% men, mean age 39.8, mean CPD 24, mean FTND score 5.6
Exclusion criteria: standard pharmacotherapy trial criteria, + use of NRT within last 30 days, use of pipe tobacco, snuff, chewing tobacco, cigars within last 30 days and throughout trial
Interventions
  • Varenicline 0.25 mg x 2/day

  • Varenicline 0.50 mg x 2/day

  • Varenicline 1.00 mg x 2/day

  • Placebo tablet x 2/day


Treatment period 12 weeks, 1st week titrated dosage. All participants received a SC booklet Clearing the Air at baseline, + brief counselling (≤ 10 min) at each clinic visit. Weekly visits throughout treatment phase, plus a 5‐min phone call at TQD and +3 days post‐TQD
In follow‐up phase, clinic visits at weeks 13, 16, 24, 36, 44 and 52, plus brief phone calls at weeks 20, 28, 32, 40 and 48
Outcomes Primary outcome: CO‐validated CAR at 9‐12 weeks
Secondary outcomes: CO‐validated CAR at 9‐24 weeks and 9‐52 weeks; 7‐day PPA at weeks 2, 12, 24 and 52
Validation was by expired CO ≤ 10 ppm
Other outcomes: withdrawal symptoms (using MNWS, QSU‐brief and mCEQ), AEs
Dropouts and losses to follow‐up were included in the analyses as continuing smokers (ITT analysis)
Attrition in treatment phase was 6.4%, losses to follow‐up 11.4% of treatment completers (excluding 1 death)
Notes Trial was funded by Pfizer Inc
New for 2008 update
Author declaration of interests: "Dr. Nakamura has received research contracts from Pfizer Japan Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), Novartis Pharma K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), and Sanofi‐Aventis K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), and a research grant from Pfizer Research Foundation (Tokyo, Japan). Dr. Oshima has received research contracts from Pfizer Japan Inc"
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "computer‐generated list of random numbers"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "randomized to 1 of the 4 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio using a central procedure"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "double‐blinding of subjects and investigators was maintained throughout the study".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No comment on level or handling of missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk CA rates for all participants reported, but demographics, withdrawal and craving measures, and PPA for nicotine‐dependent group only