Aragona 2005.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: parallel Duration: 8 weeks Assessment: baseline and post‐intervention Country: Italy |
|
Participants | Pain condition: somatoform DSM‐IV‐TR pain disorder Population: people with somatoform DSM‐IV‐TR pain disorder Minimum pain intensity: no Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 35 Age in years (mean, SD): NR Gender: 21/35 were female Pain duration: NR |
|
Interventions | Citalopram
Reboxetine
|
|
Outcomes | Pain intensity Depression AEs SAEs Withdrawal |
|
Missing data methods | LOCF | |
Funding source | NR | |
Conflicts of interest | NR | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly assigned using random tables |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information given |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information given regarding appearance of medications |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information given regarding appearance of medications |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Used LOCF as imputation method, high attrition Attrition: Total: 6/35 (17.1%) Citalopram 40 mg: 6/17 (35.3%) Reboxetine 8 mg: 9/18 (50.0%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified |