Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

Arnold 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel
Duration: 12 weeks
Assessment: baseline and post‐intervention
Country: USA
Participants Pain condition: fibromyalgia
Population: women with fibromyalgia
Minimum pain intensity: no
Inclusion criteria
  • Aged over 18 and meeting the ACR 1990 criteria for fibromyalgia


Exclusion criteria
  • Evidence of traumatic injury, inflammatory rheumatic disease, or infectious or endocrine‐related arthropathy; clinically unstable medical illness; a history of seizure, head trauma, or stroke; a lifetime history of hypomania, mania, psychosis, or dementia; alcohol or substance dependence during the past 6 months; a substantial risk of suicide; any current Axis I diagnosis; or a score of  ≥ 10 on the 17‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

  • Received monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, lithium, SSRIs, or other antidepressants within 2 weeks before randomisation; received investigational medications within 3 months before randomisation; or previously received fluoxetine for fibromyalgia


Total participants randomised: 60
Age in years (mean, SD): 46 (11)
Gender: 46/46 were female
Pain duration: average duration of fibromyalgia was 11 (9) years 
Interventions Fluoxetine
  • SSRI

  • Flexibly dosed depending upon tolerance and improvement: starting dose 20 mg/day, maximum dose 80 mg/day

  • Mean dose was 45 mg/day


Placebo
  • Inert

  • Identical capsules to fluoxetine, with matched titration process

Outcomes Pain intensity
Quality of life
Depression
Physical function
Withdrawal
Missing data methods LOCF
Funding source Pharmaceutical: Eli Lilly
Conflicts of interest NR, but authors in other papers have declared conflicts of interest regarding involvement with Eli Lilly
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not enough information ‐ just says that participants were 'randomly assigned'
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information given
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Identical capsules and titration process
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk High attrition and used LOCF
Attrition:
Total: 23/60 (38.3%)
Placebo: 12/30 (40.0%)
Fluoxetine 10‐ 30 mg: 11/30 (36.7%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or trial registration found
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias were identified