Arnold 2002.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: parallel Duration: 12 weeks Assessment: baseline and post‐intervention Country: USA |
|
Participants | Pain condition: fibromyalgia Population: women with fibromyalgia Minimum pain intensity: no Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 60 Age in years (mean, SD): 46 (11) Gender: 46/46 were female Pain duration: average duration of fibromyalgia was 11 (9) years |
|
Interventions | Fluoxetine
Placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Pain intensity Quality of life Depression Physical function Withdrawal |
|
Missing data methods | LOCF | |
Funding source | Pharmaceutical: Eli Lilly | |
Conflicts of interest | NR, but authors in other papers have declared conflicts of interest regarding involvement with Eli Lilly | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not enough information ‐ just says that participants were 'randomly assigned' |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information given |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Identical capsules and titration process |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | High attrition and used LOCF Attrition: Total: 23/60 (38.3%) Placebo: 12/30 (40.0%) Fluoxetine 10‐ 30 mg: 11/30 (36.7%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified |