Calderon 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: parallel Duration: 7 weeks Assessment: baseline, post‐intervention, follow‐up (4 weeks after post‐intervention) Country: Brazil |
|
Participants | Pain condition: orofacial pain Population: women with temporomandibular disorders Minimum pain intensity: ≥ 40 mm on a 0‐100 mm VAS Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 47 Age in years (mean, range): 35.6 (17‐52) Gender: 47/47 were female Pain duration in months (mean, range): 72.35 (6‐384) |
|
Interventions | Placebo
Placebo + CBT
Amitriptyline 25 mg
Amitriptyline 25 mg + CBT
|
|
Outcomes | Withdrawal | |
Missing data methods | Completer‐only analysis | |
Funding source | Non‐pharmaceutical ‐ Ministry of Education in Brazil | |
Conflicts of interest | NR | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomised using the website www.randomization.com |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation procedures not specified |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Due to nature of CBT group participants cannot be blinded. When comparing the placebo versus amitriptyline group(s) there was no description of whether pills were matched. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Self‐reported outcomes from unblinded participants |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | No clear explanation of reasons for withdrawal and from which group, not clear on handling missing data or group sizes in outcomes Attrition Total: 10/47 (21.3%) Placebo: 2/13 (15.4%) CBT: 2/11 (18.2%) Amitriptyline 25 mg: 2/11 (18.2%) CBT + amitriptyline 25 mg: 4/12 (33.3%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No trial registration or protocol found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified. |