Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

Cannon 1994.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel
Duration: 3 weeks
Assessment: baseline and post‐intervention
Country: USA
Participants Pain condition: non‐cardiac chest pain
Population: adults with non‐cardiac chest pain
Minimum pain intensity: NR
Inclusion criteria
  • People with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms

  • Psychiatric conditions included


Exclusion criteria
  • NR


Total participants randomised: 60
Age in years (mean, range): 50 (29‐72)
Gender: 40/60 were female
Pain duration in months (mean, range): 53 (3‐175)
Interventions Placebo
  • n = 20

  • Inert

  • Matched dosing schedule and identical capsules


Clonidine 0.2 mg
  • n = 20

  • Anti‐hypertensive

  • Fixed dose of 0.2 mg/day

  • Forced titration over 1 week


Imipramine 50 mg
  • n = 20

  • TCA

  • Fixed dose of 50 mg/day

  • Forced titration over 1 week

Outcomes AEs
Missing data methods NR
Funding source Funding: NR
Conflicts of interest NR
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation procedure not specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation procedure not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, matched dosing schedules and identical appearance
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information given regarding dropout or missing data analyses ‐ could be that everyone completed the trial but NR
Attrition
NR
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or trial registration found
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias were identified.