Cannon 1994.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: parallel Duration: 3 weeks Assessment: baseline and post‐intervention Country: USA |
|
Participants | Pain condition: non‐cardiac chest pain Population: adults with non‐cardiac chest pain Minimum pain intensity: NR Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 60 Age in years (mean, range): 50 (29‐72) Gender: 40/60 were female Pain duration in months (mean, range): 53 (3‐175) |
|
Interventions | Placebo
Clonidine 0.2 mg
Imipramine 50 mg
|
|
Outcomes | AEs | |
Missing data methods | NR | |
Funding source | Funding: NR | |
Conflicts of interest | NR | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation procedure not specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation procedure not specified |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, matched dosing schedules and identical appearance |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information given regarding dropout or missing data analyses ‐ could be that everyone completed the trial but NR Attrition NR |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified. |