Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

Forssell 2004.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: cross‐over
Duration: 4 weeks
Assessment: baseline to post‐intervention
Country: Finland
Participants Pain condition: atypical facial pain
Population: adults with atypical facial pain
Minimum pain intensity: ≥ 3 on 0‐10 scale
Inclusion criteria
  • No clear pathology or somatic findings explaining the facial pain

  • ≥ 3 on 0‐10 pain intensity scale


Exclusion criteria
  • Cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease


Total participants randomised: 30
Age in years (median, range): 52 (38‐66)
Gender: 12/30 were female
Pain duration in years (mean, SD): NR
Interventions Placebo
  • n = 30

  • Inert

  • Matched dosing schedule and identical appearance to antidepressants


Venlafaxine 37.5‐70 mg
  • n = 30

  • SNRI

  • Flexible dosing based on tolerability

Outcomes Pain intensity
Mood
Withdrawal
Missing data methods Completer analysis only
Funding source Non‐pharmaceutical: funded by Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund
Conflicts of interest NR
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were randomised using computer‐generated random numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Allocation procedure not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind with identical appearance and matched dosing schedules
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Completer‐only analysis
Attrition
Total: 10/30 (33.3%)
Venlafaxine 37.5‐70 mg: 6/30 (20.0%)
Placebo: 4/30 (13.3%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or trial registration found
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias were identified.