Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

NCT00066937.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel
Duration: 8 weeks
Assessment: baseline, post‐intervention, 3‐month follow‐up, 6‐month follow‐up
Country: USA
Participants Pain condition: temporomandibular joint disorders
Population: adults aged 18‐65 with temporomandibular joint disorders
Minimum pain intensity: no
Inclusion criteria
  • Age 18‐65

  • Pain ≤ 3 months duration due to temporomandibular joint disorder


Exclusion criteria
  • Severe physical and mental health co‐morbidities


Total participants randomised: 140
Age in years (mean, SD): 37.2 (11.5)
Gender: 28/140 were female
Pain duration in years (mean, SD): NR
Interventions Placebo (benztropine mesylate) + CBT
  • n = 38

  • Active placebo + CBT

  • Flexible titration: benztropine titrated up from 0.125 mg every night at bedtime to a maximum dose of 0.750 mg every night at bedtime based on treatment response and side effect profile

  • 6 in‐person, individual sessions of CBT for pain management


Nortriptyline + CBT
  • n = 41

  • TCA + CBT

  • Flexible titration: nortriptyline titrated up from 25 mg every night at bedtime to a maximum dose of 150 mg every night at bedtime based on treatment response and side effect profile

  • 6 in‐person, individual sessions of CBT for pain management


Placebo (benztropine mesylate) + management
  • n = 24

  • Active placebo + management

  • Flexible titration: benztropine titrated up from 0.125 mg every night at bedtime to a maximum dose of 0.750 mgevery night at bedtime based on treatment response and side effect profile

  • 6 in‐person, individual sessions of temporomandibular joint disorder disease management


Nortriptyline + management
  • n = 37

  • TCA + management

  • Flexible titration: nortriptyline titrated up from 25 mg every night at bedtime to a maximum dose of 150 mg every night at bedtime based on treatment response and side effect profile

  • 6 in‐person, individual sessions of temporomandibular joint disorder disease management

Outcomes Pain intensity
Mood
AEs
SAEs
Withdrawal
Missing data methods Completer analysis
Funding source Non‐pharmaceutical: Johns Hopkins University. Collaborator: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Conflicts of interest NR
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation methods not specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation procedures not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Although there are matched active placebos/interventions there is not enough information to determine blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Self‐reported outcomes from participants, but unsure of blinding procedures
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Completer‐only analysis
Attrition
Total: 24/140 (17.1%)
CBT: 5/38 (13.2%)
Nortriptyline 25‐150 mg + CBT: 3/41 (7.3%)
Disease management: 5/24 (20.8%)
Nortriptyline 25‐150 mg + disease management: 11/37 (29.7%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Changed primary outcome from physical and psychosocial function to "pain"
Other bias High risk Not published, all information and data extracted from trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00066937