Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

Shakiba 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel
Duration: 8 weeks
Assessment: baseline, 4 weeks, post‐intervention
Country: Iran
Participants Pain condition: fibromyalgia
Population: adults aged 18‐60 with fibromyalgia
Minimum pain intensity: ≥ 40 on 0‐100 scale
Inclusion criteria
  • Aged 18‐60 years who were diagnosed with fibromyalgia based on ACR criteria


Exclusion criteria
  • Psychiatric disorders other than depressive disorders, serious medical conditions, other pain/inflammatory conditions


Total participants randomised: 54
Age in years (mean): 41.98
Gender: 34/54 were female
Pain duration in years (mean, SD): NR
Interventions Saffron 15 mg
  • n = 27

  • Plant extract

  • Identical appearance to duloxetine


Duloxetine 30 mg
  • n = 27

  • SNRI

  • Fixed dose

Outcomes Pain intensity
Mood
Quality of life
Withdrawal
Missing data methods ITT with LOCF
Funding source Non‐pharmaceutical: "This study was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) through a grant to Prof. Shahin Akhondzadeh (Grant number 31842)."
Conflicts of interest "The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no COI. TUMS had no role in the design, conduct, data collection, analysis, data interpretation, manuscript preparation, review, final approval, or decision to submit this paper for publication."
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation to either saffron or the duloxetine arm, was carried out in a 1:1 ratio through computerised random number generation by an independent person.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Treatment allocation concealment was achieved using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Saffron capsules were identical to duloxetine in shape, size, texture, odour, and colour. Medications were distributed by an independent investigational drug pharmacist.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Self‐reported outcomes from blinded participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk State that they use ITT with LOCF, but then the n in tables is completers
Attrition
Total: 8/54 (14.8%)
Saffron 15 mg: 4/27 (14.8%)
Duloxetine 30 mg: 4/27 (14.8%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes listed prospectively: https://en.irct.ir/trial/940
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias were identified