Tasmuth 2002.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: cross‐over Duration: cross‐over periods were 4 weeks Assessment: baseline and post‐cross‐over period Country: Finland |
|
Participants | Pain condition: neuropathic pain following breast cancer treatment Population: women with neuropathic pain following treatment of breast cancer Minimum pain intensity: moderate severity (no numerical scale) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 15 Age in years (mean, range): 55 (37‐72) Gender: 15/15 were female Pain duration in months (mean, range): 20 (18‐26) |
|
Interventions | Placebo
Venlafaxine ≤ 75 mg
|
|
Outcomes | The study provided no useable data | |
Missing data methods | NR | |
Funding source | Non‐pharmacetucal: financial support was received from the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds. | |
Conflicts of interest | NR | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Hospital pharmacy performed the randomisation using computer‐generated numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | States that hospital pharmacy performed randomisation but not how this was allocated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | States double‐blind, matched dosing, but no information regarding appearance of study drugs |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Self‐reported outcomes by blinded participants, but unsure of blinding methods |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Low attrition, but not explained fully (i.e. during which period dropout happened) Attrition Total: 2/15 (13.3%) Attrition per arm NR |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified. |