Skip to main content
. 2023 May 10;2023(5):CD014682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2

Vahedi 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel
Duration: 12 weeks
Assessment: baseline, post‐intervention, follow‐up (4 weeks post‐intervention)
Country: Iran
Participants Pain condition: IBS
Population: people with pain and constipation‐predominant IBS
Minimum pain intensity: no
Inclusion criteria
  • People with pain and constipation‐predominant IBS as defined by the Rome II criteria were included


Exclusion criteria
  • Physical and severe mental health comorbidities


Total participants randomised: 44
Age in years (mean, SD): 34.9 (10.0)
Gender: 27/44 were female
Pain duration in years (mean, SD): NR
Interventions Placebo
  • n = 22

  • Inert

  • Identical appearance to fluoxetine, matched dosing


Fluoxetine 20 mg
  • n = 22

  • SSRI

  • Fixed dose

Outcomes Withdrawal
Missing data methods No participants withdrew
Funding source Non‐pharmaceutical: This study was supported by a grant from the Digestive Disease Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflicts of interest NR
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Patients were randomly assigned according to a computer‐generated randomisation table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation procedures NR
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, identical study drugs, matched dosing
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Self‐reported outcomes by blinded participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No participants withdrew
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or trial registration found
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias were identified.