Watson 1998.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Design: cross‐over Duration: each cross‐over period lasted 5 weeks Assessment: baseline and post‐cross‐over period Country: Canada |
|
Participants | Pain condition: post‐herpetic neuralgia Population: adults with post‐herpetic neuralgia Minimum pain intensity: pain of at least moderate severity (disagreeable, unpleasant, uncomfortable) for at least one half of the day; no numerical values Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total participants randomised: 33 Age in years (mean, SD): NR Gender: NR Pain duration in months (median): 13 months |
|
Interventions | Nortriptyline
Amitriptyline
|
|
Outcomes | AEs Withdrawal |
|
Missing data methods | Unclear | |
Funding source | NR | |
Conflicts of interest | NR | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Individuals were randomised by telephone at another site by computer. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | The sequence was concealed in sequential, numbered, sealed envelopes. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, identical study drugs |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Self‐reported outcomes by blinded participants |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing data methods unclear, but only 1 participant withdrew Attrition Total: 2/33 (6.1%) Amitriptyline 10‐160 mg: 1/33 (3.0%) Nortriptyline 10‐150 mg: 1/33 (3.0%) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration found |
Other bias | Low risk | No other sources of bias were identified |