Table 2.
Module grades: descriptive statistics, internal consistencies, and correlations.
| Module | N | M (SD) | Reliability1 | Correlations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | ||||
| 1. Food & Beverage workshops I | 298 | 4.85 (0.38) | 0.675 | |||||
| 2. Food & Beverage workshops II | 308 | 4.87 (0.46) | 0.616 | 0.716*** | ||||
| 3. Wine & spirits | 320 | 5.00 (0.57) | 0.651 | 0.623*** | 0.637*** | |||
| 4. Rooms division | 323 | 5.18 (0.42) | 0.548 | 0.612*** | 0.663*** | 0.618*** | ||
| 5. Introduction to business tools | 316 | 4.62 (0.98) | – | 0.420*** | 0.335*** | 0.385*** | 0.400*** | |
| 6. Introduction to hospitality management | 326 | 4.78 (0.47) | 0.481 | 0.466*** | 0.471*** | 0.513*** | 0.520*** | 0.491*** |
N = 330. Grades range from 1 (low) to 6 (high). Ns vary because modules were only graded if a student completed all mandatory courses within each module.
Course grades (cf. Table 1) were used to compute Spearman-Brown Coefficients for each module. In Introduction to hospitality management, the grade on French was excluded because otherwise no valid cases were identified (no student completed all six available courses); if taken, it contributed to the module grade as per the hospitality school’s regulations. No coefficient was calculated for Introduction to business tools because the module comprised only one course in the first semester.
***p < 0.001.