Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;37(7):1365–1370. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02134-y

Table 1.

Demographic data of patients with subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD), conventional drusen (CD), and control group.

SDD (n = 23) CD (n = 22) P-valuea Control group (n = 24) P-valueb
Age (Years) 78.74 ± 8.99 77.18 ± 8.27 0.812c 76.13 ± 8.13 0.572d
Sex (M/F) 12/11 9/13 0.465e 9/15 0.572e
BCVA (logMAR) 0.90 ± 0,14 0.82 ± 0,19 0.291c 0.90 ± 0.14 0.205d
Spherical Equivalent. (Dioptres) 0.21 ± 1.01 0.23 ± 1.10 0.998c 0.25 ± 1.40 0.995d
Phakic/Pseudophakic 14/9 16/6 0.275e 19/5 0.376e

BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, SDD subretinal drusenoid deposits, CD conventional drusen.

aComparison of eyes with SDD versus eyes with CD.

bComparison of eyes with SDD, eyes with CD and control group eyes (control group).

cPost-hoc test with Tukey’s HSD.

dANOVA.

ePearson’s chi square test, Bonferroni correction.